Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: fix sleeping-in-atomic in shared-proxy; restore meson non-sleeping

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 17:16:44 +0200, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> said:
> On 11/06/2026 9:26 am, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Hi Viachesla,
>>
>> On 10.06.2026 17:32, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:
>>> gpio-shared-proxy chooses its descriptor lock (mutex vs spinlock) from
>>> the underlying chip's can_sleep, but under that lock it calls config and
>>> direction ops that reach sleeping pinctrl paths. On a controller with
>>> non-sleeping MMIO value ops the lock is a spinlock, so a sleeping call
>>> runs from atomic context:
>>>

...

>>
>> I've checked this patchset with these two reverted and no warning was reported.
>
> If it hadn't already been fixed (...)
>

About that - Viacheslav, do you still plan to submit v2 of this?

Bart