Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: tls: size splice_short pipe by page size

From: Nirmoy Das

Date: Wed Jun 24 2026 - 09:47:08 EST



On 24.06.26 15:51, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 01:28:47PM -0700, Nirmoy Das wrote:
splice_short grows its pipe with (MAX_FRAGS + 1) * 0x1000 so it can
queue one short vmsplice() buffer for each fragment before draining the
pipe. That assumes 4K pipe buffers.

On 64K-page kernels the request is rounded to 262144 bytes, which
provides only four pipe buffers. The fifth one-byte vmsplice() blocks in
pipe_wait_writable and the test times out before it reaches the TLS path.

Request enough bytes for the same number of pipe buffers using the
runtime page size, and assert that the kernel granted at least that much.
If an unprivileged run cannot raise the pipe above the system
pipe-max-size limit, skip the test because it cannot exercise the
intended path.

Fixes: 3667e9b442b9 ("selftests: tls: add test for short splice due to full skmsg")
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
The nit below not withstanding, this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
index 30a236b8e9f73..e3bf4ade0f770 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
@@ -997,6 +997,8 @@ TEST_F(tls, splice_short)
char sendbuf[0x100];
char sendchar = 'S';
int pipefds[2];
+ int pipe_sz;
+ int ret;
int i;
sendchar_iov.iov_base = &sendchar;
@@ -1005,7 +1007,12 @@ TEST_F(tls, splice_short)
memset(sendbuf, 's', sizeof(sendbuf));
ASSERT_GE(pipe2(pipefds, O_NONBLOCK), 0);
- ASSERT_GE(fcntl(pipefds[0], F_SETPIPE_SZ, (MAX_FRAGS + 1) * 0x1000), 0);
+ pipe_sz = (MAX_FRAGS + 1) * getpagesize();
+ ret = fcntl(pipefds[0], F_SETPIPE_SZ, pipe_sz);
+ if (ret < 0 && errno == EPERM)
+ SKIP(return, "insufficient pipe capacity");
+ ASSERT_GE(ret, 0);
nit: the line above seems redundant to me given the line below.


Thanks Simon. Sent v2 with the nit addressed.



+ ASSERT_GE(ret, pipe_sz);
for (i = 0; i < MAX_FRAGS; i++)
ASSERT_GE(vmsplice(pipefds[1], &sendchar_iov, 1, 0), 0);
--
2.43.0