Re: [RFC v2 PATCH] reserve_mem: add support for static memory

From: Shyam Saini

Date: Wed Jun 24 2026 - 21:10:12 EST


Hi,


On 19 Jun 2026 11:35, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/18/26 11:23 PM, Shyam Saini wrote:
> > reserve_mem relies on dynamic memory allocation, this limits the
> > usecase where memory is required to be preserved across the boots.
> > Eg: ramoops memory reservation on ACPI platforms
> >
> > So add support to pass a pre-determined static address and reserve
> > memory at a specified location. This enables use case like ramoops
> > on ACPI platforms to reliably access ramoops region with previous
> > boot logs.
> >
> > Also skip the parsing of <align> when static address is passed.
> >
> > Example syntax for static address
> > reserve_mem=4M@0x1E0000000:oops
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0eaf3be2-5121-48b7-aeed-196405c0a480@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > v2: Fix code logic and incorporate Randy's suggestion
>
> OK, you fixed a few typos.
> There are some bigger things that you seem to have ignored.

Thanks for calling this out. You are right that I did not address all
comments in v2.
My goal for v2 was to quickly fix the core logic issue and keep
discussion focused on the reserve_mem static address direction in this
RFC cycle. I should have stated that clearly.

> > ---
> > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 ++++++
> > mm/memblock.c | 47 +++++++++++++------
> > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index b5493a7f8f228..7e0baca564b97 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -6563,6 +6563,21 @@ Kernel parameters
> >
> > reserve_mem=12M:4096:oops ramoops.mem_name=oops
> >
> > + reserve_mem= [RAM]
>
> [RAM] means "RAM disk support is enabled."
> Is that the case here? Is "reserve_mem=" only for use in case
> RAM disk support is enabled?
>
> ISTM that you need a new designator instead of RAM...
> or overload the use of RAM by adding more info near the top of
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt.

will address them in future iterations
>
> > + Format: nn[KMG]:<@offset>:<label>
> > + Reserve physical memory at predetermined location and label it with
> > + a name that other subsystems can use to access it. This is typically
> > + used for systems that do not wipe the RAM, and this command
> > + line will try to reserve the same physical memory on
> > + soft reboots. Note, it is guaranteed to be the same
> > + location unless some other early allocation, e.g.: crashkernel=256M
> > + (without static address) is reserved or overlaps this region.
> > +
> > + The format is size:offset:label for example, to request
> > + 4 megabytes for ramoops at 0x1E0000000:
> > +
> > + reserve_mem=4M@0x1E0000000:oops ramoops.mem_name=oops
> > +
> > reservetop= [X86-32,EARLY]
> > Format: nn[KMG]
> > Reserves a hole at the top of the kernel virtual
> > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> > index 6349c48154f4b..c76cefa0a8a83 100644
> > --- a/mm/memblock.c
> > +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> > @@ -2721,6 +2721,7 @@ static int __init reserve_mem(char *p)
> > char *name;
> > char *oldp;
> > int len;
> > + bool addr_is_static = false;
> >
> > if (!p)
> > goto err_param;
> > @@ -2736,19 +2737,27 @@ static int __init reserve_mem(char *p)
> > if (!size || p == oldp)
> > goto err_param;
> >
> > - if (*p != ':')
> > - goto err_param;
> > + /* parse the static memory address */
> > + if (*p == '@') {
> > + start = memparse(p+1, &p);
> > + addr_is_static = true;
> > + }
> >
> > - align = memparse(p+1, &p);
> > if (*p != ':')
> > goto err_param;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * memblock_phys_alloc() doesn't like a zero size align,
> > - * but it is OK for this command to have it.
> > - */
> > - if (align < SMP_CACHE_BYTES)
> > - align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> > + if (!addr_is_static) {
> > + align = memparse(p+1, &p);
> > + if (*p != ':')
> > + goto err_param;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * memblock_phys_alloc() doesn't like a zero size align,
> > + * but it is OK for this command to have it.
> > + */
> > + if (align < SMP_CACHE_BYTES)
> > + align = SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> > + }
> >
> > name = p + 1;
> > len = strlen(name);
> > @@ -2772,14 +2781,22 @@ static int __init reserve_mem(char *p)
> > }
> >
> > /* Pick previous allocations up from KHO if available */
> > - if (reserve_mem_kho_revive(name, size, align))
> > + if (!addr_is_static && reserve_mem_kho_revive(name, size, align))
> > return 1;
> >
> > - /* TODO: Allocation must be outside of scratch region */
> > - start = memblock_phys_alloc(size, align);
> > - if (!start) {
> > - pr_err("reserve_mem: memblock allocation failed\n");
> > - return -ENOMEM;
>
> return 1;
>
> > + if (addr_is_static) {
> > + if (memblock_reserve(start, size)) {
> > + pr_err("reserve_mem: memblock reservation failed\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> return 1;
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + } else {
> > + /* TODO: Allocation must be outside of scratch region */
> > + start = memblock_phys_alloc(size, align);
> > + if (!start) {
> > + pr_err("reserve_mem: memblock allocation failed\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> return 1;
>
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > reserved_mem_add(start, size, name);
>
>
> __setup() functions return 1 for "yes, I recognized this string/option
> and attempted to handle it" or 0 for "This string/option is meaningless."
> There is no "return -Eerror".
> If you need that, you could consider using early_param() [see
> <linux/init.h>].
>
same for this concern, will address them in next iteration.

Thanks,
Shyam