Re: [PATCH v7 25/30] drm/vc4: hdmi: Convert to common HDMI 2.0 SCDC scrambling helpers

From: Maxime Ripard

Date: Thu Jun 25 2026 - 03:48:35 EST


On Sat, Jun 13, 2026 at 03:41:20AM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On 6/12/26 3:04 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 01:44:25AM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> >> Replace the vc4-local scrambling implementation with the newly
> >> introduced DRM common SCDC scrambling infrastructure:
> >>
> >> - Advertise source-side scrambling support by setting
> >> connector->hdmi.scrambling_supported based on the variant's
> >> max_pixel_clock before drmm_connector_hdmi_init().
> >>
> >> - Provide minimal .scrambler_{enable|disable} connector callbacks that
> >> only toggle the VC5 HDMI_SCRAMBLER_CTL register. Sink-side SCDC
> >> programming and periodic status monitoring are now delegated to
> >> drm_scdc_{start|stop}_scrambling().
> >>
> >> - Replace vc4_hdmi_enable_scrambling() with a conditional call to
> >> drm_scdc_start_scrambling() in post_crtc_enable, gated on
> >> conn_state->hdmi.scrambler_needed (computed by the HDMI state helper).
> >>
> >> - Replace vc4_hdmi_disable_scrambling() with drm_scdc_stop_scrambling()
> >> in post_crtc_disable.
> >>
> >> - Drop vc4_hdmi_reset_link() and vc4_hdmi_handle_hotplug(), switching
> >> the .detect_ctx() path to
> >> drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_hotplug_ctx() which internally calls
> >> drm_scdc_sync_status() to trigger a CRTC reset on reconnection.
> >>
> >> - Drop the local scrambling_work delayed workqueue and scdc_enabled
> >> flag, now tracked by the common drm_connector_hdmi layer.
> >>
> >> - Drop vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling() and
> >> vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling() helpers, inlining the remaining 4KP60
> >> warning with an explicit drm_hdmi_compute_mode_clock() check.
> >>
> >> - Seed connector->hdmi.scrambler_enabled = true in connector_init() to
> >> ensure drm_scdc_stop_scrambling() runs at boot and disables any stale
> >> scrambling state left by the bootloader.
> >>
> >> No functional change is expected for the supported modes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I'd really like it to be broken down into several patches:
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c | 265 ++++++-----------------------------------
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.h | 8 --
> >> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> >> index 046ac4f43ba8..02f6ca6ab52b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> >> @@ -114,31 +114,6 @@
> >> #define HSM_MIN_CLOCK_FREQ 120000000
> >> #define CEC_CLOCK_FREQ 40000
> >>
> >> -static bool vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi)
> >> -{
> >> - struct drm_display_info *display = &vc4_hdmi->connector.display_info;
> >> -
> >> - lockdep_assert_held(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> -
> >> - if (!display->is_hdmi)
> >> - return false;
> >> -
> >> - if (!display->hdmi.scdc.supported ||
> >> - !display->hdmi.scdc.scrambling.supported)
> >> - return false;
> >> -
> >> - return true;
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static bool vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling(const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
> >> - unsigned int bpc,
> >> - enum drm_output_color_format fmt)
> >> -{
> >> - unsigned long long clock = drm_hdmi_compute_mode_clock(mode, bpc, fmt);
> >> -
> >> - return clock > HDMI_1_3_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> static int vc4_hdmi_debugfs_regs(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >> {
> >> struct drm_debugfs_entry *entry = m->private;
> >> @@ -272,124 +247,6 @@ static void vc4_hdmi_cec_update_clk_div(struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi)
> >> static void vc4_hdmi_cec_update_clk_div(struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi) {}
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> -static int vc4_hdmi_reset_link(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >> - struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> >> -{
> >> - struct drm_device *drm;
> >> - struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi;
> >> - struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> >> - struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> >> - struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> >> - bool scrambling_needed;
> >> - u8 config;
> >> - int ret;
> >> -
> >> - if (!connector)
> >> - return 0;
> >> -
> >> - drm = connector->dev;
> >> - ret = drm_modeset_lock(&drm->mode_config.connection_mutex, ctx);
> >> - if (ret)
> >> - return ret;
> >> -
> >> - conn_state = connector->state;
> >> - crtc = conn_state->crtc;
> >> - if (!crtc)
> >> - return 0;
> >> -
> >> - ret = drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->mutex, ctx);
> >> - if (ret)
> >> - return ret;
> >> -
> >> - crtc_state = crtc->state;
> >> - if (!crtc_state->active)
> >> - return 0;
> >> -
> >> - vc4_hdmi = connector_to_vc4_hdmi(connector);
> >> - mutex_lock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> -
> >> - if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi)) {
> >> - mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> - return 0;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - scrambling_needed = vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling(&vc4_hdmi->saved_adjusted_mode,
> >> - vc4_hdmi->output_bpc,
> >> - vc4_hdmi->output_format);
> >> - if (!scrambling_needed) {
> >> - mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> - return 0;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - if (conn_state->commit &&
> >> - !try_wait_for_completion(&conn_state->commit->hw_done)) {
> >> - mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> - return 0;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - ret = drm_scdc_readb(connector->ddc, SCDC_TMDS_CONFIG, &config);
> >> - if (ret < 0) {
> >> - drm_err(drm, "Failed to read TMDS config: %d\n", ret);
> >> - mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> - return 0;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - if (!!(config & SCDC_SCRAMBLING_ENABLE) == scrambling_needed) {
> >> - mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> - return 0;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> -
> >> - /*
> >> - * HDMI 2.0 says that one should not send scrambled data
> >> - * prior to configuring the sink scrambling, and that
> >> - * TMDS clock/data transmission should be suspended when
> >> - * changing the TMDS clock rate in the sink. So let's
> >> - * just do a full modeset here, even though some sinks
> >> - * would be perfectly happy if were to just reconfigure
> >> - * the SCDC settings on the fly.
> >> - */
> >> - return drm_atomic_helper_reset_crtc(crtc, ctx);
> >> -}
> >
> > This one doesn't look functionally equivalent to me to
> > drm_scdc_reset_crtc: this part was, in part, making sure we would only
> > reset the scrambler if it was enabled in the first place.
> > drm_scdc_reset_crtc() doesn't and will always trigger a modeset on
> > hotplug. That's unnecessary and a significant functional different.
>
> drm_scdc_reset_crtc() alone was not meant to be an equivalent of
> vc4_hdmi_reset_link(), as it only checks the sink side and it serves as an
> internal helper used exclusively by drm_scdc_sync_status().
>
> As a matter of fact, the latter is the one responsible for verifying if the
> scrambler was enabled on the controller side before attempting to invoke the
> reset logic, hence we should get the same behavior. But we don't invoke it
> directly either, it's part of the drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_hotplug_ctx()
> call path.

Oh, right, sorry.

> > I'd argue that it's drm_scdc_reset_crtc() that needs to align to what
> > vc4 was doing, not the opposite.
>
> The only difference consists in dropping the crtc state check:
>
> ret = drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->mutex, ctx);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> crtc_state = crtc->state;
> if (!crtc_state->active)
> return 0;
>
> The rationale was that when CRTC is inactive, drm_atomic_helper_reset_crtc()
> should result in a no-op commit anyway.

A commit is expensive, so I'd skip it if we can.

> And the one for the in-flight commit:
>
> if (conn_state->commit &&
> !try_wait_for_completion(&conn_state->commit->hw_done)) {
> mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> return 0;
> }

And yeah, we'll need this one too.

> Both checks are also missing in drm_bridge_helper_reset_crtc(), taken as an
> initial reference. Should we still keep any/both and sync the bridge helper
> accordingly?

Yes, but I'd expect the bridge helpers to converge / reuse your helpers
eventually anyway?

> >> -static void vc4_hdmi_handle_hotplug(struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi,
> >> - struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx,
> >> - enum drm_connector_status status)
> >> -{
> >> - struct drm_connector *connector = &vc4_hdmi->connector;
> >> - int ret;
> >> -
> >> - /*
> >> - * NOTE: This function should really be called with vc4_hdmi->mutex
> >> - * held, but doing so results in reentrancy issues since
> >> - * cec_s_phys_addr() might call .adap_enable, which leads to that
> >> - * funtion being called with our mutex held.
> >> - *
> >> - * A similar situation occurs with vc4_hdmi_reset_link() that
> >> - * will call into our KMS hooks if the scrambling was enabled.
> >> - *
> >> - * Concurrency isn't an issue at the moment since we don't share
> >> - * any state with any of the other frameworks so we can ignore
> >> - * the lock for now.
> >> - */
> >> -
> >> - drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_hotplug(connector, status);
> >> -
> >> - if (status != connector_status_connected)
> >> - return;
> >> -
> >> - for (;;) {
> >> - ret = vc4_hdmi_reset_link(connector, ctx);
> >> - if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
> >> - drm_modeset_backoff(ctx);
> >> - continue;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - break;
> >> - }
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> static int vc4_hdmi_connector_detect_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >> struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx,
> >> bool force)
> >> @@ -401,8 +258,8 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_connector_detect_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >> /*
> >> * NOTE: This function should really take vc4_hdmi->mutex, but
> >> * doing so results in reentrancy issues since
> >> - * vc4_hdmi_handle_hotplug() can call into other functions that
> >> - * would take the mutex while it's held here.
> >> + * drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_hotplug_ctx() can call into other
> >> + * functions that would take the mutex while it's held here.
> >> *
> >> * Concurrency isn't an issue at the moment since we don't share
> >> * any state with any of the other frameworks so we can ignore
> >> @@ -425,10 +282,11 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_connector_detect_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >> status = connector_status_connected;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - vc4_hdmi_handle_hotplug(vc4_hdmi, ctx, status);
> >> + ret = drm_atomic_helper_connector_hdmi_hotplug_ctx(connector, status, ctx);
> >> +
> >> pm_runtime_put(&vc4_hdmi->pdev->dev);
> >>
> >> - return status;
> >> + return ret == -EDEADLK ? ret : status;
> >> }
> >>
> >> static int vc4_hdmi_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
> >> @@ -441,9 +299,12 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
> >> if (!vc4->hvs->vc5_hdmi_enable_hdmi_20) {
> >> struct drm_device *drm = connector->dev;
> >> const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> >> + unsigned long long clock;
> >>
> >> list_for_each_entry(mode, &connector->probed_modes, head) {
> >> - if (vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling(mode, 8, DRM_OUTPUT_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB444)) {
> >> + clock = drm_hdmi_compute_mode_clock(mode, 8,
> >> + DRM_OUTPUT_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB444);
> >> + if (clock > HDMI_1_3_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ) {
> >
> > This should be a patch of its own, but I think we should turn
> > vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling() into a helper, instead of checking the
> > clock rate in every driver that might need it. From a logical standpoint
> > it's equivalent, but not from a semantic one.
>
> Ack.
>
> >
> >> drm_warn_once(drm, "The core clock cannot reach frequencies high enough to support 4k @ 60Hz.");
> >> drm_warn_once(drm, "Please change your config.txt file to add hdmi_enable_4kp60.");
> >> }
> >> @@ -540,6 +401,9 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_connector_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> >> if (vc4_hdmi->variant->supports_hdr)
> >> max_bpc = 12;
> >>
> >> + connector->hdmi.scrambler_supported =
> >> + vc4_hdmi->variant->max_pixel_clock > HDMI_1_3_TMDS_CHAR_RATE_MAX_HZ;
> >> +
> >> ret = drmm_connector_hdmi_init(dev, connector,
> >> "Broadcom", "Videocore",
> >> &vc4_hdmi_connector_funcs,
> >> @@ -561,6 +425,14 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_connector_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> >>
> >> drm_connector_helper_add(connector, &vc4_hdmi_connector_helper_funcs);
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * Since we don't know the state of the controller and its
> >> + * display (if any), let's assume it's always enabled.
> >> + * drm_scdc_stop_scrambling() will thus run at boot, make
> >> + * sure it's disabled, and avoid any inconsistency.
> >> + */
> >> + connector->hdmi.scrambler_enabled = connector->hdmi.scrambler_supported;
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * Some of the properties below require access to state, like bpc.
> >> * Allocate some default initial connector state with our reset helper.
> >> @@ -786,93 +658,30 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_write_spd_infoframe(struct drm_connector *connector,
> >> buffer, len);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -#define SCRAMBLING_POLLING_DELAY_MS 1000
> >> -
> >> -static void vc4_hdmi_enable_scrambling(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> >> +static int vc4_hdmi_scrambler_enable(struct drm_connector *connector)
> >> {
> >> - struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi = encoder_to_vc4_hdmi(encoder);
> >> - struct drm_connector *connector = &vc4_hdmi->connector;
> >> - struct drm_device *drm = connector->dev;
> >> - const struct drm_display_mode *mode = &vc4_hdmi->saved_adjusted_mode;
> >> + struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi = connector_to_vc4_hdmi(connector);
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >> - int idx;
> >> -
> >> - lockdep_assert_held(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> -
> >> - if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi))
> >> - return;
> >> -
> >> - if (!vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling(mode,
> >> - vc4_hdmi->output_bpc,
> >> - vc4_hdmi->output_format))
> >> - return;
> >> -
> >> - if (!drm_dev_enter(drm, &idx))
> >> - return;
> >
> > drm_dev_enter should be kept here
>
> Sorry, somehow I missed to realize when I prepared the patches that I
> accidentally dropped these during my initial driver rework.
>
> >
> >> - drm_scdc_set_high_tmds_clock_ratio(connector, true);
> >> - drm_scdc_set_scrambling(connector, true);
> >>
> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&vc4_hdmi->hw_lock, flags);
> >> HDMI_WRITE(HDMI_SCRAMBLER_CTL, HDMI_READ(HDMI_SCRAMBLER_CTL) |
> >> VC5_HDMI_SCRAMBLER_CTL_ENABLE);
> >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vc4_hdmi->hw_lock, flags);
> >>
> >> - drm_dev_exit(idx);
> >
> > And exit here.
> >
> >> -static void vc4_hdmi_disable_scrambling(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> >> +static int vc4_hdmi_scrambler_disable(struct drm_connector *connector)
> >> {
> >> - struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi = encoder_to_vc4_hdmi(encoder);
> >> - struct drm_connector *connector = &vc4_hdmi->connector;
> >> - struct drm_device *drm = connector->dev;
> >> + struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi = connector_to_vc4_hdmi(connector);
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >> - int idx;
> >> -
> >> - lockdep_assert_held(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
> >> -
> >> - if (!vc4_hdmi->scdc_enabled)
> >> - return;
> >> -
> >> - vc4_hdmi->scdc_enabled = false;
> >> -
> >> - if (delayed_work_pending(&vc4_hdmi->scrambling_work))
> >> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vc4_hdmi->scrambling_work);
> >> -
> >> - if (!drm_dev_enter(drm, &idx))
> >> - return;
> >
> > Ditto
> >
> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&vc4_hdmi->hw_lock, flags);
> >> HDMI_WRITE(HDMI_SCRAMBLER_CTL, HDMI_READ(HDMI_SCRAMBLER_CTL) &
> >> ~VC5_HDMI_SCRAMBLER_CTL_ENABLE);
> >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vc4_hdmi->hw_lock, flags);
> >>
> >> - drm_scdc_set_scrambling(connector, false);
> >> - drm_scdc_set_high_tmds_clock_ratio(connector, false);
> >> -
> >> - drm_dev_exit(idx);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static void vc4_hdmi_scrambling_wq(struct work_struct *work)
> >> -{
> >> - struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
> >> - struct vc4_hdmi,
> >> - scrambling_work);
> >> - struct drm_connector *connector = &vc4_hdmi->connector;
> >> -
> >> - if (drm_scdc_get_scrambling_status(connector))
> >> - return;
> >> -
> >> - drm_scdc_set_high_tmds_clock_ratio(connector, true);
> >> - drm_scdc_set_scrambling(connector, true);
> >> -
> >> - queue_delayed_work(system_percpu_wq, &vc4_hdmi->scrambling_work,
> >> - msecs_to_jiffies(SCRAMBLING_POLLING_DELAY_MS));
> >> + return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void vc4_hdmi_encoder_post_crtc_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> >> @@ -917,7 +726,7 @@ static void vc4_hdmi_encoder_post_crtc_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vc4_hdmi->hw_lock, flags);
> >> }
> >>
> >> - vc4_hdmi_disable_scrambling(encoder);
> >> + drm_scdc_stop_scrambling(&vc4_hdmi->connector);
> >
> > I don't think the names here are right. It's not *only* related to scdc
> > but also to the HDMI controller. I'm fine with using a scdc prefix but
> > only for the things related to scdc. This is related (in part) to the
> > HDMI controller, so it should use a drm_connector_hdmi prefix.
>
> Ack. I guess we should also move these helpers out of drm_scdc_helper.c, but
> unsure where. FWIW I'm currently working on adding HDMI 2.1 FRL support, and
> implemented the link training in a dedicated drm_hdmi_frl_helper.c.
>
> Should we create drm_hdmi_scrambler_helper.c? Or maybe have a common one to
> hold both - any suggestion for the naming?

display/drm_hdmi_helper.c sounds like a great place for both?

> >
> >> drm_dev_exit(idx);
> >>
> >> @@ -1625,6 +1434,7 @@ static void vc4_hdmi_encoder_post_crtc_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> >> struct drm_display_info *display = &vc4_hdmi->connector.display_info;
> >> bool hsync_pos = mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC;
> >> bool vsync_pos = mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC;
> >> + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >> int ret;
> >> int idx;
> >> @@ -1693,7 +1503,10 @@ static void vc4_hdmi_encoder_post_crtc_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> >> }
> >>
> >> vc4_hdmi_recenter_fifo(vc4_hdmi);
> >> - vc4_hdmi_enable_scrambling(encoder);
> >> +
> >> + conn_state = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state(state, connector);
> >> + if (conn_state && conn_state->hdmi.scrambler_needed)
> >> + drm_scdc_start_scrambling(connector);
> >
> > And the nice thing with a drm_connector_hdmi_* prefix is that you don't
> > have to shoehorn it into SCDC support anymore, so you can take a state
> > as an argument, and do the check in the helper instead of doing it in
> > every driver and hoping they get it right.
>
> I was about to consider a similar approach before deciding to let drivers manage
> the logic, i.e. to prevent loosing flexibility later when dealing with HDMI 2.1.
> That was mostly in the context of supporting drivers to define if/when a display
> mode that fits in TMDS should be sent over FRL.
>
> Thinking again, that's not really a valid concern right now, e.g. will use TMDS
> by default for all supported modes, and switch to FRL only when absolutely
> required. Later we might consider extending the infrastructure to support
> dynamic control if required.

Thanks for working on FRL as well :)

I agree, let's focus on getting HDMI 2.0 right, and then we'll try to
make 2.1 the easiest to work with for drivers.

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature