Re: [PATCH v2] sunrpc: hardcode pool_mode to pernode, remove other modes

[Chuck Lever]

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026, at 10:14 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> Regarding Chucks comments, I think a minimum of one thread per node,
> rather than a minimum of one thread total, is the sensible approach.
> Of course if there exist memory-only nodes, they wouldn't need a thread.

What happens when transport work is scheduled on a memory-only
pool? Obviously there's no execution engine there, even if we
do provide one or more threads.


-- 
Chuck Lever