Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test split above max_nr_regions/2
From: SeongJae Park
Date: Fri Jun 26 2026 - 10:55:27 EST
On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:58:38 +0800 Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add a test that exercises kdamond_split_regions() when the total
> region count is already above max_nr_regions / 2, asserting that the
> function still splits a fraction of the regions (makes progress) and
> does not overshoot max_nr_regions.
>
> The region size and min_region_sz are picked so the split arithmetic
> does not depend on the page size.
>
> All tests pass:
> damon: pass:31 fail:0 skip:0 total:31
> Totals: pass:31 fail:0 skip:0 total:31
Nice!
>
> Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
I have trivial comments below, though.
> ---
> mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> index 29fbe495e532..6fe7abcd670d 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> @@ -341,6 +341,69 @@ static void damon_test_split_regions_of(struct kunit *test)
> damon_destroy_ctx(c);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * When the total region count is already above max_nr_regions / 2,
> + * kdamond_split_regions() must keep refining the resolution by splitting a
> + * fraction of the regions (making progress), without exceeding
> + * max_nr_regions.
> + */
> +static void damon_test_split_above_half_progresses(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct damon_ctx *c;
> + struct damon_target *t;
> + struct damon_region *r;
> + unsigned long start;
> + unsigned int nr_before, nr_after, i;
> + const unsigned int nr_init = 760;
> + const unsigned long region_sz = 100;
> +
> + c = damon_new_ctx();
> + if (!c)
> + kunit_skip(test, "ctx alloc fail");
> +
> + /* Keep the split arithmetic independent of the page size */
> + c->min_region_sz = 1;
> + c->attrs.min_nr_regions = 10;
> + c->attrs.max_nr_regions = 1500;
> +
> + t = damon_new_target();
> + if (!t) {
> + damon_destroy_ctx(c);
> + kunit_skip(test, "target alloc fail");
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_init; i++) {
> + start = i * region_sz;
> + r = damon_new_region(start, start + region_sz);
> + if (!r) {
> + damon_free_target(t);
> + damon_destroy_ctx(c);
> + kunit_skip(test, "region alloc fail");
> + }
> + r->nr_accesses = (i & 1) ? 0 : 100;
> + r->age = 5;
> + damon_add_region(r, t);
> + }
> +
> + damon_add_target(c, t);
> +
> + nr_before = damon_nr_regions(t);
> + /* Above max_nr_regions / 2, so the blanket-split path is skipped */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_GT(test, (unsigned long)nr_before,
> + c->attrs.max_nr_regions / 2);
Above KUNIT_EXPECT_GT() feels unnecessary.
> +
> + kdamond_split_regions(c);
> +
> + nr_after = damon_nr_regions(t);
> + /* Still made progress ... */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_GT(test, nr_after, nr_before);
> + /* ... but did not overshoot the configured maximum */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, (unsigned long)nr_after,
> + c->attrs.max_nr_regions);
In future, we may do this multiple times.
> +
> + damon_destroy_ctx(c);
> +}
> +
Thanks,
SJ
[...]