Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] dt-bindings: display: verisilicon,dc: generalize for single-output variants

[Conor Dooley]

On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 05:33:26PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +        resets:
> > > > > > > +          minItems: 1
> > > > > > > +          maxItems: 1
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +        reset-names:
> > > > > > > +          items:
> > > > > > > +            - const: core
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This is just maxItems: 1.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well the implicit rules of DT binding schemas are quite
> > > > > weird...
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think it is that strange, as the binding has
> > > >   reset-names:
> > > >     items:
> > > >       - const: core
> > > >       - const: axi
> > > >       - const: ahb
> > > 
> > > Ah does the list constraint the order of items? If it constrains
> > > the
> > 
> > It does, yes.
> > Alternatively, using an enum permits free ordering.
> 
> Ah in this case this should be converted to an enum, I think.
> 
> Should I send a patch for converting it?

Why do you think it should be an enum? We don't currently have any users
of this that only provide no core or no axi reset.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature