Re: [PATCH] riscv: Fix a NULL pointer reference in machine_kexec_prepare

From: Pratyush Yadav

Date: Mon Jun 29 2026 - 07:20:07 EST


+Cc IMA maintainers

On Fri, Jun 26 2026, Baoquan He wrote:

> Add kexec ML to CC.
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 7:46 AM Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Kindly ping, any comments?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tao Liu
>>
>> On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 3:35 PM Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > A NULL pointer reference issue is noticed in riscv's machine_kexec_prepare,
>> > where image->segment[i].buf might be NULL and copied unchecked.
>> >
>> > The NULL buf comes from security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c:
>> > ima_add_kexec_buffer(), where kbuf is added by kexec_add_buffer(),
>> > but kbuf.buffer is NULL.
>> >
>> > Fix this by simply adding a check before copy.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 3 +++
>> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>> > index 2306ce3e5f22..d81d576f9cb5 100644
>> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>> > @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *image)
>> > if (image->segment[i].memsz <= sizeof(fdt))
>> > continue;
>> >
>> > + if (image->segment[i].buf == NULL)
>> > + continue;
>> > +
>
> This is a good fix, maybe we can add code comments to explain it as
> below, just for reference.
>
> /*
> * Some segments (e.g. IMA) reserve space but have no buffer
> * loaded yet. Skip them as they cannot contain an FDT.
> */
> And is there any other place where the similar issue exists? e.g on LoongArch?
>
> Other than above concerns, this patch looks good to me:
>
> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yeah, the patch LGTM to me too.

Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@xxxxxxxxxx>

Although I think IMA can make this a bit easier to understand. First, in
ima_add_kexec_buffer() it should set kbuf.buffer to NULL and kbuf.bufsz
to 0 explicitly instead of using kexec_buffer and kexec_buffer_size
which are initialized to NULL and 0, but never updated. Using the
variables here adds an extra level of indirection.

Also, perhaps we should add a comment in ima_add_kexec_buffer() about
how this all works, since where the IMA buffer lives and where it gets
updated it fairly complicated and took me some time to piece together.

--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav