[tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Fix stale comments referring to removed CFS concepts

From: tip-bot2 for Zhan Xusheng

Date: Tue Jun 30 2026 - 08:01:54 EST


The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID: 19b7bdc3a1550ab2550427c33395bec7caeaf72d
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/19b7bdc3a1550ab2550427c33395bec7caeaf72d
Author: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@xxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:02:00 +08:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:30:23 +02:00

sched/fair: Fix stale comments referring to removed CFS concepts

A few comments still describe the pre-EEVDF CFS world:

- sysctl_sched_base_slice is documented as "Minimal preemption
granularity for CPU-bound tasks". That was the wording of the old
sysctl_sched_min_granularity, renamed in commit e4ec3318a17f
("sched/debug: Rename sysctl_sched_min_granularity to
sysctl_sched_base_slice"). Under EEVDF it is the default base time
slice / request size (r_i) used to compute the virtual deadline, as
documented in update_deadline().

- Two comments still mention sched_slice(), which was removed when the
fair class committed to EEVDF in commit 5e963f2bd465 ("sched/fair:
Commit to EEVDF"). The dequeue-path comment should simply refer to
the task's slice (se->slice); the forced-idle comment describes the
slice accounting now performed by __entity_slice_used(), which is the
function actually used right below it.

No functional changes.

[ mingo: Ported to a more recent scheduler base ]

Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260629030200.3165589-1-zhanxusheng@xxxxxxxxxx
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ce05acf..fc6cd55 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -73,7 +73,10 @@
unsigned int sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling = SCHED_TUNABLESCALING_LOG;

/*
- * Minimal preemption granularity for CPU-bound tasks:
+ * Default base time slice (request size r_i) for SCHED_NORMAL/SCHED_BATCH:
+ *
+ * Under EEVDF this is the request size used to compute the virtual
+ * deadline; see update_deadline().
*
* (default: 0.70 msec * (1 + ilog(ncpus)), units: nanoseconds)
*/
@@ -14676,7 +14679,7 @@ static inline void task_tick_core(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
* if the sibling is forced idle, then trigger schedule to
* give forced idle task a chance.
*
- * sched_slice() considers only this active rq and it gets the
+ * __entity_slice_used() considers only this active rq and it gets the
* whole slice. But during force idle, we have siblings acting
* like a single runqueue and hence we need to consider runnable
* tasks on this CPU and the forced idle CPU. Ideally, we should