Re: [PATCH 07/30] mm/rmap: elide unnecessary static inline's in interval_tree.c

[Pedro Falcato]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 01:23:18PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> It's not necessary to declare these functions static inline as they are
> contained within a single compilation unit.

FWIW I don't think it's technically strictly equivalent (I have a vague
memory of inline lightly suggesting inlining a function to GCC, because of
compat reasons). Anyway, doesn't really matter, practically any static
function gets inlined with -O2 anyway.

> 
> This makes the anonymous interval tree code consistent with the newly
> updated file-backed interval tree code.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@xxxxxxx> 

-- 
Pedro