Re: [PATCH v3.1] sched/isolation: Defer freeing of cpumask memblock memory to initcall

[Phil Auld]

Hi Waiman,

On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 02:24:40PM -0400 Waiman Long wrote:
> When testing a linux-next kernel with commit 59bd1d914bb5 ("memblock:
> warn when freeing reserved memory before memory map is initialized"),
> the following warning was hit when there was a "nohz_full" kernel boot
> parameter.
> 
>   Cannot free reserved memory because of deferred initialization of the memory map
>   WARNING: mm/memblock.c:904 at __free_reserved_area+0xde/0xf0, CPU#0: swapper/0/0
>     :
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    memblock_phys_free+0xcb/0x100
>    housekeeping_init+0x14c/0x170
>    start_kernel+0x207/0x450
>    x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30
>    x86_64_start_kernel+0xda/0xe0
>    common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
>    </TASK>
> 
> IOW, we shouldn't free memblock allocated memory so early
> in the boot process when memory map isn't fully initialized in
> deferred_init_memmap().
> 
> Fix it by saving the housekeeping cpumask memblock memory to
> be freed into a free list in housekeeping_init() and add a new
> housekeeping_late_init() helper to defer the actual freeing of memblock
> memory to when initcall's are being processed. The non-atomic version
> of the llist APIs are used as there is no contention.
> 
> This commit also depends on the presence of commit 7c2eee9c1367
> ("memblock: don't touch memblock arrays when memblock_free() is called
> late") to prevent a KASAN UAF bug report [1].
> 
>  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260505051821.1107133-1-longman@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Fixes: 27c3a5967f05 ("sched/isolation: Convert housekeeping cpumasks to rcu pointers")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/isolation.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>  [v3.1] Add __initdata to memblock_freelist
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> index ef152d401fe2..156025ef81b7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>   *
>   */
>  #include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
> +#include <linux/llist.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include "sched.h"
>  
> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ struct housekeeping {
>  };
>  
>  static struct housekeeping housekeeping;
> +static __initdata LLIST_HEAD(memblock_freelist);
>  
>  bool housekeeping_enabled(enum hk_type type)
>  {
> @@ -189,10 +191,22 @@ void __init housekeeping_init(void)
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(omask));
>  		cpumask_copy(nmask, omask);
>  		RCU_INIT_POINTER(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], nmask);
> -		memblock_free(omask, cpumask_size());
> +		__llist_add((struct llist_node *)omask, &memblock_freelist);

This cast is somewhat concerning. I think I see why it's needed. Wrapping
it in a proper struct would require more allocating and freeing and
make the problem worse. It should work though.


Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@xxxxxxxx>




Cheers,
Phil


>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static int __init housekeeping_late_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct llist_node *llnode, *pos, *t;
> +
> +	/* Free allocated memblock memory, if any */
> +	llnode = __llist_del_all(&memblock_freelist);
> +	llist_for_each_safe(pos, t, llnode)
> +		memblock_free(pos, cpumask_size());
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +pure_initcall(housekeeping_late_init);
> +
>  static void __init housekeeping_setup_type(enum hk_type type,
>  					   cpumask_var_t housekeeping_staging)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.54.0
> 
> 

--