[REGRESSION] sched/idle: Sysbench threads regression after f4c31b07b136
From: Joseph Salisbury
Date: Thu Jul 02 2026 - 12:41:33 EST
Hi Rafael,
We are seeing a reproducible MySQL Sysbench threads regression. A bisect indicated the following commit as the first bad commit:
f4c31b07b136 ("sched: idle: Consolidate the handling of two special cases")
The regression was found in Oracle kernel performance testing on OCI VM shapes:
VM Details:
* VM.Standard2.1:
x86 OCI VM shape, 1 OCPU / 2 hardware threads, about 14.5 GB RAM
* VM.Standard.A1.Flex.2:
Arm/Ampere A1 flexible VM shape, 2 vCPU threads, about 10.9 GB RAM
The ResultsDB runs show the regression in the Sysbench threads metric:
- VM.Standard2.1: 333 -> 236 (-29.1%)
- VM.Standard.A1.Flex.2: 1286 -> 1152 (-10.4%)
A test kernel was built with f4c31b07b136 reverted and the performance regression was recovered.
From the code, it is possible the regression is due to the new previous-wakeup heuristic in the special idle cases. Before the commit:
- no cpuidle driver:
tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick()
default_idle_call()
- one idle state:
tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick()
cpuidle state 0
After the commit, both paths use:
idle_call_stop_or_retain_tick(got_tick)
Here, got_tick is true if the CPU was woken from the previous idle-loop iteration by the scheduler tick, and false otherwise. On this workload/platform combination, using that previous wakeup source to decide whether to stop or retain the tick appears to change NOHZ behavior enough to regress this wakeup-heavy threaded workload.
Do you have any thoughts on whether this is an expected tradeoff of the new heuristic, or whether the special cases need a narrower condition? For our stable kernels, the immediate candidate fix is to revert the backport, but before doing that I wanted to ask whether upstream would prefer a targeted adjustment.
I can collect additional data if useful, for example cpuidle driver/state information, timer interrupt counts, idle residency, perf stat, or scheduler trace data from the affected OCI shapes.
#regzbot introduced: f4c31b07b136839e0fb3026f8a5b6543e3b14d2f
Thanks,
Joe