Re: [PATCH] docs: link AI coding assistants and tool-generated content pages

[SJ Park]

On Thu,  2 Jul 2026 17:49:01 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Both of these guidelines are complimentary to one another - one specifying
> guidelines on AI coding assistants, and the other specifying those for
> tool-generated content.
> 
> Since they are complimentary to one another, provide a link to each in the
> other.

Makes perfect sense to me.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: SJ Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst | 4 ++++
>  Documentation/process/generated-content.rst | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
> index 899f4459c52d..6125ee4914c5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
> @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ kernel development process:
>  * Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
>  * Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> 
> +For guidelines on content generated by AI coding assistants see:

A comma after 'assistants' is missed?

> +
> +* Documentation/process/generated-content.rst
> +
>  Licensing and Legal Requirements
>  ================================
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/generated-content.rst b/Documentation/process/generated-content.rst
> index 08621e50a462..aad2caad9f8b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/generated-content.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/generated-content.rst
> @@ -107,3 +107,10 @@ the resulting changes.
> 
>  If you do so anyway, maintainers are entitled to reject your series
>  without detailed review.
> +
> +References
> +==========
> +
> +For specific guidelines on AI coding assistants, see:

Or, a comma is unnecessarily added after 'assistants'.

Whatever, I think keeping those identical is better.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]