Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Improve Qualcomm EUD driver and platform support

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 07:48:42AM -0700, Elson Serrao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/1/2026 10:06 AM, Elson Serrao wrote:
> > Note: This v4 revision introduces a design change compared to v3.
> > Based on discussion and feedback, the binding adopts a child-node-based
> > model while preserving the legacy top-level 'ports' property. The
> > child-node approach is required because EUD needs a separate OF graph
> > per UTMI path to accurately describe per-path role switching.
> > 
> > Link to the discussion leading to this decision:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260324172916.804229-1-elson.serrao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> 
> 
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> Just following up on this series.
> 
> Could you please take a look at the updated design and share
> your feedback? Does it align with what we discussed earlier:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260324172916.804229-1-elson.serrao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Please let me know if any further changes are needed.

Excuse me for the delayed response.

Yes, it's better now. I've asked a quesion regarding using eud-path node
vs having more ports.


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry