Re: [PATCH V2 4/6] null_blk: move unregister_blkdev() after destroying dev in null_exit()

[Damien Le Moal]

On 7/7/26 11:55, Zizhi Wo wrote:
> In null_exit(), unregister_blkdev() was called before the null_blk

s/was/is

> instances were destroyed, which is inconsistent with the cleanup order in
> null_init(). Move it after null_destroy_dev() so that teardown happens in
> the reverse order of initialization.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Suggested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research