Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] mm/hugetlb: Dynamic, NUMA-aware HugePage Cache & Free Page Reporting

[Muchun Song]

> On Jul 7, 2026, at 15:29, David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 7/7/26 08:42, Sourav Panda wrote:
>> Overview
>> This patch series introduces a dynamic, NUMA-aware HugePage Cache,
>> backed by a kernel shrinker to safely return memory under pressure, and
>> integrates it with Free Page Reporting (virtio-balloon) for HugeTLB,
>> specifically targeting gigantic (1GB) hugepages. The goal is to solve
>> the tradeoff between allocation latency and memory
>> fungibility in virtualized and heterogeneous cloud environments.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> in general, we consider hugetlb nowadays to be mostly in feature freeze, as we
> realized a while ago that adding more special casing on top of something too
> special for all of MM is only going to hurt us more in the long run.
> 
> We want to have less special casing and less special sauce, not more.
> 
> Now, there is nothing wrong in making hugetlb be less special, by making it use
> more of core infrastructure etc.

+1

HugeTLB is already complex today, and the last thing we want is to compound
this complexity by piling more features on top of it. I fully share your view
that we should avoid going down this direction.

Thanks,
Muchun

> 
> But optimizing for surplus hugetlb pages by teaching hugetlb about new caches
> and its custom free-page-reporting support rather looks like the wrong direction
> for me?
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> David