Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution

[Jonathan Corbet]

Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Then someone can basically just merge the original patch I sent since
>> everyone seems to agree on that front. And then the extension to include
>> how the LLM was used can be discussed in a separate patch.
>
> https://patch.msgid.link/20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@xxxxxxxxxx

I still have it around :)  I can apply it if that's truly the
consensus... I'll confess to having not entirely kept up with the
conversation over the holiday weekend, though, and needing to review
things.

If you object, do let me know.

Thanks,

jon