Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Lenovo ThinkPad T14s EC thermal monitoring and thermal zone integration
From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Wed Jul 08 2026 - 09:17:58 EST
Hi Stephan,
On 7/8/26 14:03, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 09:22:25PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
This series extends the Lenovo ThinkPad T14s embedded controller driver
with environmental monitoring capabilities and integrates the exposed
sensors into the Linux thermal framework.
The EC provides access to several platform temperature sensors
covering the SoC, keyboard area, bottom cover, charging circuitry, QTM
module and SSD. These sensors are currently used by the firmware for
thermal management but are not exposed to Linux.
The first patch adds hwmon support for the EC temperature sensors.
The second patch exposes the EC as a thermal sensor provider in the
device tree and defines thermal zones for the keyboard skin
temperature and the charging circuitry temperature. This allows the
generic thermal framework to react to EC-reported temperatures and
apply standard Linux thermal mitigation policies.
As the EC protocol is not fully decoded, the passive trip points
get/set actions are missing, so it is not possible to program a
threshold and receive an interrupt when crossed the way up or
down. Consequently, the thermal zone related to the charging circuitry
is polled every two seconds until we can set the trip points in the
EC.
This series fixes critical thermal issues happening on this platform
where a kernel compilation, or heavy workloads, lead to a system
reboot.
Thanks for working on this! I have a few comments/questions about this:
Thanks for jumping in the discussion
1. EC vs PMIC temperature sensors
AFAIK, the T14s (and actually most X1E laptops) have two sets of
thermistors in each location: One is connected to the PMIC (called
SYS_THERMx), and the other set is connected to the EC.
From the schematics I have in my possession, the SYS_THERMx are connected to the EC, at least this is how they are named. May be it is the other set with different numbers.
I'm curious to know why this mirroring ?
The SYS_THERMx sensors connected to the PMIC have been enabled for the
T14s already over a year ago [1]. The reason this is not upstream is
that we now been waiting 3 years for the corresponding ADC/thermal code
to land upstream [2]. It seems pretty close now, the ADC part has landed
and there is only the thermal part left [3].
Right, I have to pick this one.
The PMIC thermistor setup is likely going to be similar for most X1E
laptops, so I think it would be preferable to use that instead of the EC
sensors to implement additional temperature throttling. It also supports
interrupts/trip points already, so it doesn't need polling.
I definitively second that
The most recent proposed patch actually adds the SYS_THERMx thermal
zones to all X1E-based devices [4], although I'm not sure if it would be
better to keep that device-specific...
[1]: https://github.com/stephan-gh/linux/commit/c0ddc9fa96667d6b32d690ce6a3dcfc76aaabad6
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230708072835.3035398-1-quic_jprakash@xxxxxxxxxxx/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20260705-gen3_adc_tm-v3-0-ac62f387dbce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20260614-adc5_gen3_dt-v2-4-32ec576c5865@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
2. EC sensor mapping vs PMIC sensor mapping
In PATCH 2/3 you define:
{ .label = "soc", .reg = T14S_EC_SYS_THERM0 },
{ .label = "keyboard", .reg = T14S_EC_SYS_THERM1 },
{ .label = "base", .reg = T14S_EC_SYS_THERM2 },
{ .label = "charging", .reg = T14S_EC_SYS_THERM3 },
{ .label = "qtm", .reg = T14S_EC_SYS_THERM6 },
{ .label = "ssd", .reg = T14S_EC_SYS_THERM7 },
I'm not sure if this is correct. When comparing this with the data read
from the sensors connected to the PMIC:
| Sensor | PMIC Channel | EC (hwmon) | PMIC (thermal) | Delta |
|-----------------|--------------|--------------|-----------------|----------|
| SOC | SYS_THERM0 | 79.0°C | 78.7°C | +0.3°C |
| Keyboard | SYS_THERM1 | 68.0°C | 70.1°C | -2.1°C |
| Base / Back | SYS_THERM2 | 66.0°C | 64.6°C | +1.4°C |
| Charging | SYS_THERM3 | 73.0°C | 73.8°C | -0.8°C |
| West / QTM | SYS_THERM6 | 64.0°C | 62.6°C | +1.4°C |
| SSD | SYS_THERM7 | 31.0°C | 67.1°C | -36.1°C |
| Modem | SYS_THERM4 | N/A | 31.6°C | N/A |
| East | SYS_THERM5 | N/A | 70.3°C | N/A |
The SSD delta of 36°C is definitely suspicious. I think
"ssd"/T14S_EC_SYS_THERM7 in your EC driver patch is actually the modem
sensor (SYS_THERM4).
Yes probably, it was unclear from the documentation. I may have mixed some info.
The SoC sensor seems to be hotter than the Charging sensor. I'm a bit surprised because I've always seen charging hotter than the rest.
If you look at a picture of the T14s mainboard
(https://www.notebookcheck.net/fileadmin/_processed_/d/c/csm_DSC_0003_aadae1ddd2.jpg)
and zoom in to the unpopulated modem sub-board left to the fan you can
see the two thermistors RT601 and RT301. The SSD on the other hand sits
almost directly next to the SoC on the right, so I wouldn't expect it to
stay > 30°C cooler than its surroundings.
However, there are also two thermistors next to the SSD, see e.g. this
close-up picture of the mainboard:
https://download.lenovo.com/Images/Parts/5B21P83385/5B21P83385_A.jpg
This means that the SSD is probably one of the other mappings. If the
thermistors are consecutively numbered in the EC firmware, the SSD
(RT8203) might be actually the third sensor ("base"/T14S_EC_SYS_THERM2).
I'm not sure how to figure out the proper mapping.
The back of the mainboard is completely covered with tape
(https://download.lenovo.com/Images/Parts/5B21P83377/5B21P83377_B.jpg)
so it's impossible to see anything there.
3. Active vs passive throttling
Are you matching the Windows cooling/throttling setup here? If not, have
you considered how this interacts with the fan control applied by the
EC? I'm a bit worried that this might lead to unexpected performance
regressions if we start throttling before the EC runs the fan at full
speed.
For the moment, I would say fixing the critical issue is the highest priority. With the 'charging' sensor with a 55°C trip point, AFAICT the fan is at full speed before this trip is reached.
Then we may want to take control of the fan and add active trip and passive trip.
This autonomous EC / PMIC mix sounds a bit strange to me :/