Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] fs/pipe: unify the page pools into a single per-pipe pool

[Mateusz Guzik]

On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 5:11 PM Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That said, your approach is better than what I had, and I would like to
> integrate it to this patch set. Os it OK if I give a Co-developed-with:
> tag?

imo this is too trivial compared to the entirety of the patchset to
warrant attribution. Just take it.

To be clear, I just now verified avoidance of the extra trip resolved
the regression for me so I have no objections to the patchset.

For completeness I note I failed to remove the lock acquire in
anon_pipe_trim_pool_and_unlock, but I presume you noticed (at worst
while testing).

One suggestion I have is to post the entire thing as one patch as I
don't think the split here buys anything, but I'm not going to insist
one way or the other.