Re: [PATCH 5/5] riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()

From: Nam Cao

Date: Wed Jul 08 2026 - 16:52:07 EST


Nam Cao <namcao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> André Almeida <andrealmeid@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> So if the build has support for CAS, the function overwrite what it had
>> just set. Why do it even writes it in the first place then, can't this
>> be an if/else?
>
> Functionally speaking, an if/else makes more sense. However, I cannot
> figure out how to do that without creating a complete mess, since
> *_try_unlock_cs_cas_start and *_try_unlock_cs_cas_end are not always
> available. If you have a suggestion, please do let me know. But doing
> it this way only costs us a few more instructions.

Look at this again, we can do something like below. Let me send v3.

#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) && defined(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZACAS)
#define FUTEX_CAS_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol) \
{ \
void *start = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_cas_start)); \
void *end = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_cas_end)); \
\
futex_set_vdso_cs_range(fd, idx, (uintptr_t)start, (uintptr_t)end, xlen == 32); \
}
#else
#define FUTEX_CAS_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(...) BUILD_BUG()
#endif

#define FUTEX_LRSC_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol) \
{ \
void *start = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_lrsc_start)); \
void *end = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_lrsc_end)); \
\
futex_set_vdso_cs_range(fd, idx, (uintptr_t)start, (uintptr_t)end, xlen == 32); \
}

#define FUTEX_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol) \
{ \
if (cpu_supports_zacas()) { \
FUTEX_CAS_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol); \
} else { \
FUTEX_LRSC_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol); \
} \
}