Re: [PATCH v3 16/17] selftests/verification: Rearrange the wwnr_printk test

[Nam Cao]

Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Simplify the test and run the steps expecting no reaction before the one
> expecting reactions.

This requirement is not clear from the code. I fear a new developer who
wants to introduce a new test case will easily trip over this, or even
us a few months from now.

Instead of this, how about each test case discards or ignores all
previous reactions?

Nam