RE: [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: dts: exynos: add initial support for Samsung Exynos8855 smdk

[Alim Akhtar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2026 3:30 PM
> To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Peter Griffin'
> <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: robh@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linusw@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-
> soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> hajun.sung@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: dts: exynos: add initial support for Samsung
> Exynos8855 smdk
> 
> On 10/07/2026 11:55, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile           |   1 +
> >>>  .../boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855-pinctrl.dtsi   | 574 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855-smdk.dts |  32 +
> >>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855.dtsi    | 204 +++++++
> >>>  4 files changed, 811 insertions(+)
> >>>  create mode 100644
> >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855-pinctrl.dtsi
> >>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855-smdk.dts
> >>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855.dtsi
> >>> +       };
> > [snip]
> >>> +
> >>> +       oscclk: clock-oscclk {
> >>> +               compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >>> +               clock-output-names = "oscclk";
> >>> +               #clock-cells = <0>;
> >>> +       };
> >>
> >> Small nit, but I believe oscclk node should be ordered
> >> alpha-numerically by the node name. See
> >> https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-
> >> style.html
> >>
> > Thanks, will update in v4
> 
> 
> The node feels ordered, no? clock before cpu?
> 
Right, " ordered alpha-numerically by the node name"

Krzysztof, do you want to send v4 with all the reviewed-by tag collected? 


> Best regards,
> Krzysztof