Re: [PATCH v7 11/12] virt/steal_monitor: Act on steal time periodically and decide on preferred CPUs
From: Yury Norov
Date: Fri Jul 10 2026 - 16:38:52 EST
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 03:26:47AM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> schedule work at regular intervals. Interval is determined by
> interval_ms parameter. schedule_delayed_work is used since interval_ms
> is usually in order of milliseconds. Work need not happen instantly.
>
> Periodic work function essentially does:
> - Calculate the steal_ratio as below.
>
> steal_ratio = (delta_steal * 100*100)/(delta_ns * num_cpus())
>
> It is calculated to consider the fractional values of steal time.
> I.e 10 means 0.1% steal time. A few tricks such as divide by 10,000
> are used to avoid possible overflow.
> - If steal value is higher than high threshold, call the method to reduce
> the preferred CPUs.
> - If steal value is lower or equal to low threshold, call the method to
> increase the preferred CPUs.
> - If the steal value is in between, no action is taken.
> - Save the values for next delta calculations.
> - Save the current direction of steal values to avoid oscillations.
> So two consecutive values of high values or low values are taken for
> decrease/increase of preferred CPUs.
> - Ensure design checks are met.
> 1. At least one core/CPU must be there in preferred mask.
> 2. preferred CPUs is subset of active CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v6->v7:
> - Merge two patches which did periodic work function.
> - Misc checks for early firing, requeue work, math safety.
>
> drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.c b/drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.c
> index 4a03c14337be..09a5c3a299c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ struct steal_monitor sm_core_ctx = {
> .low_threshold = 200, /* 2% */
> };
>
> +enum sm_direction {
> + SM_DIR_INCREASE = -1,
> + SM_DIR_NONE = 0,
> + SM_DIR_DECREASE = 1,
> +};
> +
> static int param_set_interval_ms(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> {
> unsigned int interval;
> @@ -106,14 +112,82 @@ module_param_cb(low_threshold, &low_threshold_ops, &sm_core_ctx.low_threshold, 0
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(low_threshold,
> "Low steal threshold. default: 200 i.e 2%. Must be < high_threshold");
>
> +static void compute_preferred_cpus_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + u64 curr_steal, delta_steal, delta_ns, steal_ratio;
> + ktime_t now;
> +
> + now = ktime_get();
> + delta_ns = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(now, sm_core_ctx.prev_time));
> +
> + if (unlikely(delta_ns < NSEC_PER_MSEC)) {
> + pr_err_ratelimited("steal_monitor: work scheduled too soon delta_ns: %llu\n",
> + delta_ns);
> + goto requeue_work;
> + }
> +
> + curr_steal = get_system_steal_time();
> + delta_steal = curr_steal > sm_core_ctx.prev_steal ?
> + curr_steal - sm_core_ctx.prev_steal : 0;
> +
> + /* Update for next calculation */
> + sm_core_ctx.prev_steal = curr_steal;
> + sm_core_ctx.prev_time = now;
> +
> + /*
> + * steal_ratio = (delta_steal * 100*100)/(delta_ns * num_cpus())
> + * To avoid possible overflow, divide the denominator early.
> + * Note minimum interval is 10ms.
> + */
> + delta_ns = div_u64(delta_ns * get_num_cpus_steal_ratio(), 100 * 100);
> + steal_ratio = div64_u64(delta_steal, delta_ns);
> +
> + if (sm_core_ctx.prev_direction == SM_DIR_DECREASE &&
> + steal_ratio > sm_core_ctx.high_threshold)
> + decrease_preferred_cpus(&sm_core_ctx);
> + if (sm_core_ctx.prev_direction == SM_DIR_INCREASE &&
> + steal_ratio <= sm_core_ctx.low_threshold)
> + increase_preferred_cpus(&sm_core_ctx);
I already said, I don't like this SM_DIR approach. If you want to
avoid oscillations, just increase the gap. If it doesn't work, then we
need to understand why.
> +
> + /*
> + * mark the direction. Increasing the gap between hi and lo_threshold
> + * helps to avoid ping-pongs.
> + */
> + if (steal_ratio > sm_core_ctx.high_threshold)
> + sm_core_ctx.prev_direction = SM_DIR_DECREASE;
> + else if (steal_ratio <= sm_core_ctx.low_threshold)
> + sm_core_ctx.prev_direction = SM_DIR_INCREASE;
> + else
> + sm_core_ctx.prev_direction = SM_DIR_NONE;
> +
> +requeue_work:
> + /* maintain design constructs always */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(cpu_preferred_mask));
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_subset(cpu_preferred_mask, cpu_active_mask));
cpu_read_lock here? And again, you should do something to restore
integrity. WARN_ON is not enough. The simplest and safest thing you
can do is to unload the driver. You definitely shouldn't schedule a
new work against the broken cpu_preferred_mask.
> +
> + /* Trigger for next sampling */
> + schedule_delayed_work(&sm_core_ctx.work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(sm_core_ctx.interval_ms));
> +}
> +
> static int __init steal_monitor_init(void)
> {
> - pr_info("steal_monitor is enabled\n");
> + pr_info("steal_monitor is enabled. interval: %ums, high_threshold: %u, low_threshold: %u\n",
> + sm_core_ctx.interval_ms, sm_core_ctx.high_threshold, sm_core_ctx.low_threshold);
> +
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sm_core_ctx.work, compute_preferred_cpus_work);
> + sm_core_ctx.prev_steal = get_system_steal_time();
> + sm_core_ctx.prev_time = ktime_get();
> +
> + schedule_delayed_work(&sm_core_ctx.work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(sm_core_ctx.interval_ms));
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> static void __exit steal_monitor_exit(void)
> {
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sm_core_ctx.work);
cancel_delayed_work_sync() is not enough for a self-requeueing work.
compute_preferred_cpus_work() always requeues itself. Module unload
can return with delayed work armed against module text/data. Use
disable_delayed_work_sync() or a stop flag checked before requeueing.
> guard(cpus_read_lock)();
> cpumask_copy(&__cpu_preferred_mask, cpu_active_mask);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.h b/drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.h
> index ee68cd8b1944..7c7a9bced682 100644
> --- a/drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/virt/steal_monitor/sm_core.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
> #include <linux/topology.h>
> #include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
> +#include <linux/math64.h>
>
> struct steal_monitor {
> struct delayed_work work;
> --
> 2.47.3