Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Add support for the aggregated read query opcode

[Bart Van Assche]

On 7/12/26 7:52 PM, Hyeoncheol Jeong wrote:
> Would it be okay to keep utp_transfer_cmd_desc as is and give
> just the reserved tag a dedicated 4 KiB response descriptor?
> Regular tags and normal I/O would stay unchanged.

That sounds better to me but how to implement the above proposal
without slowing down the hot path?

Thanks,

Bart.