Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] arm64/vmalloc: Allow arch_vmap_pte_range_map_size to batch multiple CONT_PTE
From: Anshuman Khandual
Date: Tue Jul 14 2026 - 03:13:29 EST
On 09/07/26 1:08 PM, Wen Jiang wrote:
> From: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Allow arch_vmap_pte_range_map_size to batch across multiple CONT_PTE
> blocks, reducing both PTE setup and TLB flush iterations.
Too little commit description for the proposed change here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Jiang <jiangwen6@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Xueyuan Chen <xueyuan.chen21@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h
> index 4ec1acd3c1b34..7d9c7dc795c42 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/vmalloc.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_vmap_pte_range_map_size(unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long end, u64 pfn,
> unsigned int max_page_shift)
> {
> + unsigned long size;
> +
> /*
> * If the block is at least CONT_PTE_SIZE in size, and is naturally
> * aligned in both virtual and physical space, then we can pte-map the
> @@ -40,7 +42,9 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_vmap_pte_range_map_size(unsigned long addr,
> if (!IS_ALIGNED(PFN_PHYS(pfn), CONT_PTE_SIZE))
> return PAGE_SIZE;
>
> - return CONT_PTE_SIZE;
> + size = min3(end - addr, 1UL << max_page_shift, PMD_SIZE >> 1);
> + size = rounddown_pow_of_two(size);
> + return size;
Please do explain the fact in a comment that huge pte mappings
upto PMD_SIZE are being allowed here, if the given block is
CONT_PTE_SIZE aligned.
IIUC arch_vmap_pte_range_map_size() gets used only when config
CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is enabled. Hence should not these new huge
sizes being supported here also be added as valid HugeTLB sizes
thus updating __hugetlb_valid_size() and adding corresponding
new HugeTLB page sizes with hugetlb_add_hstate() ?
OR could arch_vmap_pte_range_map_size() and set_huge_pte_at()
can be updated for vmalloc without doing corresponding changes
into HugeTLB itself ?
> }
>
> #define arch_vmap_pte_range_unmap_size arch_vmap_pte_range_unmap_size