Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/9] Add System Controller support for RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs

[Lad, Prabhakar]

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the review.

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 5:00 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 at 14:31, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > This series adds support for the System Controller (SYSC) blocks found on
> > the Renesas RZ/T2H and RZ/N2H SoCs. These blocks handle critical low-power
> > management and access control functions.
> >
> > Hardware Architecture & Dependency Challenges:
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > The SYSC in these SoCs is a multi-functional block responsible for:
> >     - Clock & Reset Control
> >     - Low Power Management
> >     - Clock Monitor (CLMA)
> >     - Access Control
> >
> > A key architectural detail is that these SYSC blocks are physically located
> > within the CPG/MSSR (Clock Pulse Generator / Module Standby Software Reset)
> > address space. While the CPG/MSSR driver is already implemented and
> > functional for these SoCs, the integration of SYSC adds a layer of
> > complexity due to a cyclic dependency:
> >     - SYSC requires CPG: The system controller needs a clock to operate.
> >     - CPG requires SYSC: Access control registers within the SYSC contain
> >       bits necessary to control the PLLs managed by the CPG.
> >
> > If implemented as a completely separate top-level system controller node, we
> > would face a cyclic dependency between the CPG and SYSC drivers during the
> > boot process.
> >
> > Proposed Implementation
> > ----------------------------
> > To resolve this, the SYSC blocks are represented as child nodes of the
> > CPG/MSSR controller in the device tree. The SYSC regmap is registered
> > directly against the CPG device node. This hierarchy correctly models the
> > hardware address space while allowing the drivers to share resources
> > without deadlock.
> >
> > I am sending this as an RFC specifically to get feedback on the
> > implementation of the SYSC as child nodes of the CPG to resolve the
> > dependency cycle.
>
> Personally, I am not a big fan of subnodes.  I assume you are using
> subnodes because you can register only a single regmap per syscon node?
Yes so that the consumers don't have to specify it by indexing.

> Would it be possible to just extend the existing clock-controller
> node with two more reg entries, and expose them through a single
> combined regmap?
>
That should be possible. Or would you prefer just to extend the sizes
and create a single regmap for it?

               cpg: clock-controller@80280000 {
                        compatible = "renesas,r9a09g077-cpg-mssr";
-                       reg = <0 0x80280000 0 0x10000>,
-                             <0 0x81280000 0 0x10000>;
+                       reg = <0 0x80280000 0 0x20000>,
+                             <0 0x81280000 0 0x20000>;

Cheers,
Prabhakar

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds