Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/page_alloc: rename FPI_TRYLOCK -> FPI_NOLOCK

[Zi Yan]

On Tue Jul 14, 2026 at 5:31 AM EDT, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> As discussed in the linked patch, the there is some inconsistency between
> "trylock" and "nolock" nomenclature, let's align it. Since "nolock" is
> used in the public API it seems to have more mindshare so do that.
>
> The linked patch did this for the ALLOC_ flag but forgot about FPI_.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260703-alloc-trylock-v5-1-c87b714e19d3@xxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi