Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: mpm: Document power-domains property

[Marek Szyprowski]

On 13.07.2026 17:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 11:25:41 +0100,
> Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Remove #power-domain-cells property and add power-domains property for
>> MPM device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml          | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml
>> index ebb40c48950ab3a8fc86f5708acfc33c33d68993..3f9645fbc3c20633077aaa589e5d5a43928dab51 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml
>> @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ properties:
>>          - description: MPM pin number
>>          - description: GIC SPI number for the MPM pin
>>  
>> -  '#power-domain-cells':
>> -    const: 0
>> +  power-domains:
>> +    maxItems: 1
> What makes you think it is OK to change an existing binding in an
> incompatible way?


Ulf suggests that this has been modeled upside down in the initial
submission:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAPx+jO9d1qH12mxg-n1rkbp6Xd__sdrSMeoc7CPELE+jgxRYHA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland