Re: [GIT PULL] arm_mpam fixes for v7.2-rc2
From: Ben Horgan
Date: Wed Jul 15 2026 - 09:12:31 EST
Hi Will,
On 7/15/26 14:01, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 05:23:38PM +0100, Ben Horgan wrote:
>> On 7/9/26 16:48, Ben Horgan wrote:
>>> I hope this method works for sending you MPAM changes but please let me know if
>>> you would like them some other way or I've made a mistake. It's not a signed tag
>>> as I still need to sort out my GPG key. The change authored by be me hasn't got
>>> an Reviewed-by's or Tested-by's but it's been on the list since the middle of
>>> May and James is on leave.
>>>
>>> Fix the reset values for two MPAM controls that are not known to exist in
>>> silicon. Fix a NULL pointer dereference on the driver teardown path.
>>>
>> Sorry, this is a retake. I forgot to add my Sob on the patches.
>>
>> The following changes since commit 8cdeaa50eae8dad34885515f62559ee83e7e8dda:
>>
>> Linux 7.2-rc2 (2026-07-05 14:44:06 -1000)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>> git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:linux-arm/linux-bh.git tags/mpam-fixes-7.2-rc2-RETAKE
>
> Thanks, but I'll probably just pick these from the list given that your
> key isn't sorted out yet.
Ok, thank you, is there anything that you need from me for this iteration?
>
> In future, it's probably easiest if you go down the route that James
> used to tread where you collect the mpam patches up and then send them
> out as a series (with your SoB added and with me and Catalin on cc) once
> they've been reviewed and you're happy with them. Then we can just grab
> 'em that way. I think that's probably easiest to start with, but we can
> revisit it if the number of patches becomes too much.
>
> Does that sound ok?
Yes, I'm happy with that.
Thanks,
Ben
>
> Will