Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: bail out early on non-AMD platform

From: Zhongqiu Han

Date: Thu Jul 16 2026 - 10:22:10 EST


Hi Qianheng,

Thank you for your patience. It looks good to me overall, just a few
nits inline.

On 7/16/2026 4:51 PM, Qianheng Peng wrote:
The crash issue may occur when modprobe amd_pstate_ut on intel platform.


It is better to start with:

"Loading the amd-pstate-ut module on a non-AMD platform triggers a NULL
pointer dereference:"

or

"A kernel NULL pointer dereference occurs when loading the amd-pstate-ut
module on a non-AMD (e.g. Intel) platform"

amd_pstate_ut: 1 amd_pstate_ut_acpi_cpc_valid success!
amd_pstate_ut: 2 amd_pstate_ut_check_enabled success!
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000080
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 20300 Comm: modprobe
Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O 6.6.0-0010.rc1.ctl4.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: FiberHome R2200 V5/Xeon Boards, BIOS 3.1a 02/24/2020
RIP: 0010:amd_pstate_ut_check_perf+0x141/0x280 [amd_pstate_ut]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
amd_pstate_ut_init+0x1b/0xff0 [amd_pstate_ut]
? __pfx_amd_pstate_ut_init+0x10/0x10 [amd_pstate_ut]
do_one_initcall+0x42/0x2e0
? kmalloc_trace+0x26/0x90
do_init_module+0x60/0x240
__se_sys_init_module+0x185/0x1c0
do_syscall_64+0x62/0x190
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
</TASK>

Add state detection to amd pstate driver to prevent amd_pstate_ut driver

This change fixes the amd-pstate-ut module rather than the amd-pstate
driver itself. Maybe something like:

"Add driver-state detection to the amd-pstate-ut module ..."

from testing on non-AMD platforms.

It also covers the AMD_PSTATE_DISABLE case but not only non-AMD platforms.

And likewise, the subject may be changed as well, for example:

"cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: Bail out early if the amd-pstate driver is not
running"

or

"cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: Skip tests when amd-pstate driver is not
active"



Fixes: 14eb1c96e3a3 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add test module for amd-pstate driver")
Suggested-by: Li Xiong <xiongl24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Xibo Wang <wangxb12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qianheng Peng <pengqh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
v3:
- Remove unnecessary NULL check
- Add detection to driver state instead of driver name

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1784108124-19988-1-git-send-email-pengqh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Print policy->cpu instead of policy->kboj.name
- Add cpufreq driver name detection to amd_pstate_ut

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1784015941-26535-1-git-send-email-pengqh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index 735b29f..2142838 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -560,6 +560,11 @@ static int amd_pstate_ut_check_freq_attrs(u32 index)
static int __init amd_pstate_ut_init(void)
{
u32 i = 0, arr_size = ARRAY_SIZE(amd_pstate_ut_cases);
+ enum amd_pstate_mode mode = amd_pstate_get_status();
+
+ /* don't test if no running amd-pstate driver */

How about:

"/* Do not run tests when the amd-pstate driver is not active. */"

+ if (mode == AMD_PSTATE_UNDEFINED || mode == AMD_PSTATE_DISABLE)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
for (i = 0; i < arr_size; i++) {
int ret;


Anyone, please feel free to correct or ignore any of the nits above.

Regardless, the patch code looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


--
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han