Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] power: sequencing: pcie-m2: Report power controllability

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam

Date: Thu Jul 16 2026 - 10:39:51 EST


On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 11:57:30AM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote:
> The M.2 Key E connector gates its functions through the W_DISABLE1#
> (PCIe/WiFi) and W_DISABLE2# (Bluetooth) signals. When a signal is not
> routed to a host GPIO, the corresponding enable/disable callbacks are
> no-ops, so the host cannot gate that function's power on its own.
>

I think it is misleading to say that if W_DISABLE{1/2}# signals are not
available then we cannot control the function's power. Power to the function
only comes from the core 3.3v regulator, and these signals only enable/disable
the radio (WLAN/BT) as per the spec.

- Mani

> Implement the per-unit .is_controllable() callback on the "uart-enable"
> and "pcie-enable" units so that consumers can query this per instance
> (based on the runtime presence of the W_DISABLE2#/W_DISABLE1# GPIOs) via
> pwrseq_power_is_controllable().
>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-pcie-m2.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-pcie-m2.c b/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-pcie-m2.c
> index e3ba9169144dabbf0c553c0a4302c3b511fcaaa1..4bcd5078609da1be966ab30c73cffae5e578934f 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-pcie-m2.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-pcie-m2.c
> @@ -84,11 +84,24 @@ static int pwrseq_pci_m2_e_uart_disable(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq)
> return gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->w_disable2_gpio, 1);
> }
>
> +static bool pwrseq_pci_m2_e_uart_is_controllable(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq)
> +{
> + struct pwrseq_pcie_m2_ctx *ctx = pwrseq_device_get_drvdata(pwrseq);
> +
> + /*
> + * The UART enable is driven through the W_DISABLE2# line. When it is not
> + * wired up on this connector the enable/disable callbacks are no-ops, so
> + * the host cannot gate the Bluetooth function on its own.
> + */
> + return !!ctx->w_disable2_gpio;
> +}
> +
> static const struct pwrseq_unit_data pwrseq_pcie_m2_e_uart_unit_data = {
> .name = "uart-enable",
> .deps = pwrseq_pcie_m2_unit_deps,
> .enable = pwrseq_pci_m2_e_uart_enable,
> .disable = pwrseq_pci_m2_e_uart_disable,
> + .is_controllable = pwrseq_pci_m2_e_uart_is_controllable,
> };
>
> static int pwrseq_pci_m2_e_pcie_enable(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq)
> @@ -105,11 +118,24 @@ static int pwrseq_pci_m2_e_pcie_disable(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq)
> return gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->w_disable1_gpio, 1);
> }
>
> +static bool pwrseq_pci_m2_e_pcie_is_controllable(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq)
> +{
> + struct pwrseq_pcie_m2_ctx *ctx = pwrseq_device_get_drvdata(pwrseq);
> +
> + /*
> + * The PCIe/WiFi enable is driven through the W_DISABLE1# line. When it
> + * is not wired up on this connector the enable/disable callbacks are
> + * no-ops, so the host cannot gate the PCIe/WiFi function on its own.
> + */
> + return !!ctx->w_disable1_gpio;
> +}
> +
> static const struct pwrseq_unit_data pwrseq_pcie_m2_e_pcie_unit_data = {
> .name = "pcie-enable",
> .deps = pwrseq_pcie_m2_unit_deps,
> .enable = pwrseq_pci_m2_e_pcie_enable,
> .disable = pwrseq_pci_m2_e_pcie_disable,
> + .is_controllable = pwrseq_pci_m2_e_pcie_is_controllable,
> };
>
> static const struct pwrseq_unit_data pwrseq_pcie_m2_m_pcie_unit_data = {
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>

--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்