Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] phonet: pep: convert getsockopt to sockopt_t
From: David Laight
Date: Fri Jul 17 2026 - 04:25:05 EST
On Thu, 16 Jul 2026 06:00:03 -0700
Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Continue converting the proto-layer getsockopt callbacks to the
> sockopt_t interface, splitting pep_getsockopt() into a
> do_pep_getsockopt() helper that takes a sockopt_t.
>
> The thin pep_getsockopt() wrapper keeps its __user signature for now:
> it builds a user-backed sockopt_t with sockopt_init_user(), calls the
> helper, and writes the returned length back to optlen. The helper uses
> copy_to_iter() instead of copy_to_user(). No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/phonet/pep.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/phonet/pep.c b/net/phonet/pep.c
> index 60d1a5375725b..c7f4ce894af56 100644
> --- a/net/phonet/pep.c
> +++ b/net/phonet/pep.c
> @@ -1078,17 +1078,11 @@ static int pep_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int pep_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> - char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
> +static int do_pep_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, sockopt_t *opt)
> {
> struct pep_sock *pn = pep_sk(sk);
> int len, val;
>
> - if (level != SOL_PNPIPE)
> - return -ENOPROTOOPT;
> - if (get_user(len, optlen))
> - return -EFAULT;
> -
> switch (optname) {
> case PNPIPE_ENCAP:
> val = pn->ifindex ? PNPIPE_ENCAP_IP : PNPIPE_ENCAP_NONE;
> @@ -1112,11 +1106,33 @@ static int pep_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> return -ENOPROTOOPT;
> }
>
> - len = min_t(unsigned int, sizeof(int), len);
> - if (put_user(len, optlen))
> + len = min_t(unsigned int, sizeof(int), opt->optlen);
I'm pretty sure that can be min().
More generally I'm not at all sure about negative lengths.
Historically the user type would have been 'int', but it got replaced
by socklen_t which is probably unsigned.
(IIRC one of the 64bit Unix had started using a 64bit type but I think
it was sun objected to making that change so socklen_t was born.)
Also truncating below 4 bytes makes no sense here on BE systems.
Some code will try to write the significant bytes out, but that
would be better done in the wrapper.
> + opt->optlen = len;
> + if (copy_to_iter(&val, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
> return -EFAULT;
> - if (copy_to_user(optval, &val, len))
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pep_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> + char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
> +{
> + sockopt_t opt;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (level != SOL_PNPIPE)
> + return -ENOPROTOOPT;
> +
> + err = sockopt_init_user(&opt, optval, optlen);
Have I not looked at these before?
Why is this here, not in the outer code?
David
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = do_pep_getsockopt(sk, optname, &opt);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + if (put_user(opt.optlen, optlen))
> return -EFAULT;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
>