Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: glymur-gcc: Add missing CX power domain

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 7/17/26 11:30 AM, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/17/2026 6:45 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 04:42:11PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/16/2026 12:52 PM, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>>> On 26-07-16 10:13:48, Taniya Das wrote:

[...]

>> You're expressing this in generic terms, can you please provide the
>> concrete example of what this would look for in the Glymur GCC case? 
>>
> 
> Yes, Bjorn, this is indeed a general requirement for a clock controller.
> 
> In Glymur I do see that CX could drop to retention corner in case there
> is no vote from any subsystem and so it is better to vote from clock
> controller a level above retention using the required-opps.
> 

Is this still a valid concern in light of

Commit 7178817f1904 ("pmdomain: qcom: rpmhpd: Skip retention by default")

?

Konrad