Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mseal: remove further superfluous comments, do_mseal()

[David Hildenbrand (Arm)]

On 7/16/26 15:43, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> There's no need to abstract do_mseal() any longer so put the system call
> implementation in the system call declaration.
> 
> The comment around do_mseal() is strangely formatted, overly long and adds
> a lot of superfluous information that the code already provides, so boil it
> down to the essentials.

Lol, just what I had in mind in my comment to #2.

Nice!

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>


-- 
Cheers,

David