Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: iio: light: ltr501: Add ltr329 compatible

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:14:55 +0000
Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thursday, 16 July 2026 at 10:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 02:27:24PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:  
> > > LTR-329ALS-01 is an ambient light sensor similar to LTR-303ALS-01, but
> > > without interrupt support.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/liteon,ltr501.yaml | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/liteon,ltr501.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/liteon,ltr501.yaml
> > > index ab9bb68dd736..76e81eba7ea4 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/liteon,ltr501.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/liteon,ltr501.yaml
> > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
> > >        - liteon,ltr559
> > >        - liteon,ltr301
> > >        - liteon,ltr303
> > > +      - liteon,ltr329  
> > 
> > Do not grow lists at the end, they are ordered alphanumerically to avoid
> > conflicts.  
> 
> Placing the new entry at the top would produce a rather strangely order list:
> 
> ltr329
> ltr501
> ltr559
> ltr301
> ltr329
> 
> Should I add a patch sorting the entire list to avoid this kind of
> confusion in the future?
> 
Please do a precursor patch for that  Also do it for the id tables in the driver.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> /Esben