Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] spi: dt-bindings: add spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz property
From: Santhosh Kumar K
Date: Mon Jul 20 2026 - 06:35:11 EST
On 20/07/26 15:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 20/07/2026 10:48, Santhosh Kumar K wrote:
On 20/07/26 13:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 20/07/2026 09:38, Santhosh Kumar K wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
index 880a9f624566..12211f8c9f7d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml
@@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ properties:
description:
Maximum SPI clocking speed of the device in Hz.
+ spi-max-post-config-frequency-hz:
+ description:
+ Maximum SPI clock frequency in Hz achievable after controller-side
+ configuration.
How did you implement my feedback?
Three points from your feedback:
1. -hz suffix: added
2. Array property: I still lean towards keeping this as a scalar for
now, as we don't have a concrete use case for multiple values today, and
supporting two frequencies should be sufficient for the foreseeable
future. I had responded to this in the v4 discussion as well, you may
have missed that response.
3. maxItems: Since the property remains a scalar, I have not added maxItems.
So how did you make this property scalar?
The -hz suffix constraints the property to a uint32 scalar through the
DT schema framework's property-units.yaml.
Hm, where? I completely missed that, can you point me to the specific
line? I see clearly that it is not a scalar.
Adding an explicit $ref or maxItems for a unit-suffixed property is
rejected by dtbs_check with:
- "Standard unit suffix properties don't need a type $ref"
This I did not propose - the type is fixed.
- "Scalar properties should not have array keywords"
Cannot reproduce it.
I overlooked this. You are right, and I apologize for the incorrect
explanation.
The -hz suffix maps to uint32-matrix in property-units.yaml, not a
scalar. Without 'maxItems: 1', the property can accept multiple values.
I should have verified this before responding. Sorry again!
I'll add 'maxItems: 1' in the next version.
Thanks,
Santhosh.
Best regards,
Krzysztof