Re: [PATCH] mm/kmemleak: report RCU-tasks quiescent states during the scan
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Jul 20 2026 - 18:39:59 EST
On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 06:23:45 -0700 Breno Leitao <leitao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> kmemleak_scan() can run for ages on large debug kernels. It was
> causing some soft-lockups which I got fixed with commit
> 3175fcfec8b16baeb ("mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task
> stacks") with our beloved cond_resched().
>
> I've got the fix above deployed in the Meta fleet, and now I am seeing:
>
> INFO: rcu_tasks detected stalls on tasks:
> task:kmemleak state:R ... nvcsw: 274/274 holdout: 1 idle_cpu: -1/3
> scan_block
> scan_gray_list
> kmemleak_scan
>
> and, worse, blocks the callers waiting on that grace period. Here a BPF
> struct_ops map free, which waits via synchronize_rcu_mult(call_rcu,
> call_rcu_tasks), is stuck long enough to also trip the hung task check:
>
> INFO: task kworker/...:bpf_map_free_deferred blocked for 122 seconds
> __wait_rcu_gp
> bpf_struct_ops_map_free
>
> Then I've learned that cond_resched() is not an RCU-tasks quiescent
> state, so, we need to use stronger primitives.
>
> Use cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() at the scan reschedule points so the scan
> reports an RCU-tasks quiescent state as it proceeds.
>
> Inspired by commit b96285e10aad ("tracing: Have osnoise_main() add a
> quiescent state for task rcu").
I'll add
Fixes: c4b28963fd79 ("mm/kmemleak: rely on rcu for task stack scanning")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.
.