Re: [PATCH 08/11] sched_ext: Delegate proxy donor admission to BPF schedulers

[John Stultz]

On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 9:54 PM Andrea Righi <arighi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 05:37:29PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > Though, looking at your patch stack, I'd rather not make my patches
> > under review a dependency for your patches.  Peter has not yet put his
> > laser-eyes upon my series so there's no telling how much rework they
> > may need (and it does have some subtle parts that I'm sure he'll have
> > feedback on). So just to allow your current series to be able to move
> > foward, would it make sense if I added your "sched: Distinguish proxy
> > activations from wakeups" patch to the end of my series?  It looks
> > like there's not much interlock on the rest of your changes (though
> > I've not carefully reviewed the diff from your scx-proxy-exec branch
> > as they are on different bases), so maybe that would just work and the
> > rest of your series could move forward?
>
> Sounds like a good plan! It'd be helpful if you could include
> "sched: Distinguish proxy activations from wakeups" at the end of your
> sleeping-owner series.

Will do! I've got a few more things to cleanup and get through
testing, but I'm hoping to get v31 out to the list soon.

> I'll move the combined version to scx-proxy-exec-sleeping-owner for testing and
> rebase the scx-proxy-exec series without the sleeping-owner changes, so that it
> can move forward independently for now.

Sounds good!

Thanks so much again for all your work here! Its really appreciated!
-john