Re: [PATCH bluez RFC 2/3] doc: hci-protocol: Add sock option BT_RCV_VENDOR_PKT for HCI_CHANNEL_USER

[Zijun Hu]

On 7/20/2026 10:10 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
>> +-----------------------------------
>> +
>> +Enable receiving vendor HCI frames, requires hci_channel to be set to
>> +HCI_CHANNEL_USER.
>> +
>> +Default is disabled.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +.. code-block::
>> +
>> +    int enable = 1;
>> +    int err;
>> +
>> +    err = setsockopt(fd, SOL_BLUETOOTH, BT_RCV_VENDOR_PKT, &enable,
>> +                                                    sizeof(enable));
>> +
> I don't think we have any socket option with this name, besides this
> should really go as an HCI packet with an H4 header set accordingly.

Hi Luiz,

I named it after BT_SNDMTU/BT_RCVMTU, but that may not be a good fit.
Any preferred name?
Happy to rename.