Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] mm/slub: skip handle_failed_objexts_alloc() with profiling disabled
From: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
Date: Tue Jul 21 2026 - 05:23:48 EST
On 7/21/26 07:51, Harry Yoo wrote:
>
>
> On 7/20/26 11:16 PM, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
>> The function might get called with memory allocation profiling disabled,
>> when the obj_ext array is allocated for objcg pointers only. The
>> handling is however unnecessary in that case, so skip it.
>>
>> This would otherwise become a real bug later, as pointed out by sashiko.
>> For now it's just an optimization.
>>
>> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715-b4-objext_split-v1-0-9a49c4ccf4c3@xxxxxxxxxx?part=10
>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> mm/slub.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index 76acb78f2655..95fa6fbad11a 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -2101,15 +2101,16 @@ static inline bool mark_failed_objexts_alloc(struct slab *slab)
>> static inline void handle_failed_objexts_alloc(unsigned long obj_exts,
>> struct slabobj_ext *vec, unsigned int objects)
>> {
>> + if (!mem_alloc_profiling_enabled())
>> + return;
>
> This looks racy.
Indeed, not sure how I convinced myself it's ok.
> Can we instead do this later in the series depending on
> slab_obj_ext_has_codetag_key's value?
Yeah.
>> /*
>> * If vector previously failed to allocate then we have live
>> * objects with no tag reference. Mark all references in this
>> * vector as empty to avoid warnings later on.
>> */
>> if (obj_exts == OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL) {
>> - unsigned int i;
>> -
>> - for (i = 0; i < objects; i++)
>> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < objects; i++)
>> set_codetag_empty(&vec[i].ref);
>> }
>> }
>>
>