Re: [PATCH v5 08/14] mfd: lm3533: Convert to use OF bindings

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 16:57:01 +0300
Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> пт, 3 лип. 2026 р. о 14:03 Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> пише:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 11:00:25AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:  
> > > Since there are no users of this driver via platform data, remove the
> > > platform data support and switch to using Device Tree bindings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson (RISCstar) <danielt@xxxxxxxxxx> #for backlight
> > >       indio_dev->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> > > -     iio_device_set_parent(indio_dev, pdev->dev.parent);  
> >
> > Why are you reparenting the iio device here?
> >  
> 
> Because every cell has its own binding now and using phandle to parent
> when device has its own node is not a good practice.

It is however a good point.  So should at very least the ABI break should
be called out in the patch description with a brief mention of what the
path change actually is.

> 
> > That's an ABI break.
> >  
> 
> This driver does not have any active users in the kernel and no
> activity for more then 2 years.

...

> > > +     u32 count = 0, reg, nchilds;  
> >
> > Don't mix multiple declarations with initialisation like this.
> >  
> 
> Checkpatch does not complain on style issue, hence this is not prohibited.

Prohibition vs taste.  I fully agree with John on this one!  Those mixes are
messy and hard to read.

Checkpatch is a helpful tool but there are both rules and preferred style things
it does not catch.

Jonathan

> 
> > >       int ret;
> > >