Re: [PATCH v2] docs: dt: writing-schema: Extend expectations about example part of binding

[Rob Herring (Arm)]

On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:22:41 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Document already used rules about example DTS in the binding:
> 
>  - All final device bindings (except sub-block of more complex devices)
>    should have an example.
> 
>  - Phandles do not need to be resolvable - Sashiko already provided
>    incorrect review, so this might help it to understand the concept.
> 
>  - Example should be complete, readable (use known defines), without
>    'status' property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 1. Rewrite "optional" exception, as Conor suggested.
> 2. "normal" -> "typical" in last sentence about status.
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst          | 13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Applied, thanks!