Re: [PATCH v2 12/13] mm/slab: add cache_ and slab_needs_objcg() helpers

From: Hao Li

Date: Thu Jul 23 2026 - 06:07:49 EST


On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:30:49AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> On 7/23/26 11:25, Hao Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> >> @@ -359,6 +359,13 @@ struct kmem_cache *__kmem_cache_create_args(const char *name,
> >> goto out_unlock;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * For now we assume any cache can be used with __GFP_ACCOUNT and thus
> >> + * may need to store objcg pointers for objects
> >> + */
> >> + if (!mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled())
> >> + flags |= SLAB_MAY_ACCOUNT;
> >
> > if memcg itself is disabled via `cgroup_disable`, mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled()
> > still return false, so maybe we can use:
>
> Aha, but then shouldn't rather mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled() take that into
> account on its own?

Yeah, it's better to handle two cases in mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled!
This could also be a standalone patch, but including it to this patchset it totally
fine.

>
> > if (!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled())
> > flags |= SLAB_MAY_ACCOUNT;
> >
> >> +
> >> /* Fail closed on bad usersize of useroffset values. */
> >> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY) ||
> >> WARN_ON(!args->usersize && args->useroffset) ||
> >> @@ -984,11 +991,19 @@ new_kmalloc_cache(int idx, enum kmalloc_cache_type type)
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> /*
> >> - * If CONFIG_MEMCG is enabled, disable cache merging for
> >> - * KMALLOC_NORMAL caches.
> >> + * If memcg_kmem is enabled and this is a KMALLOC_NORMAL cache and not
> >> + * aliased with any other type, make sure it's never merged with any other
> >> + * cache.
> >> + *
> >> + * In other cases the kmalloc cache may end up being used for a
> >> + * __GFP_ACCOUNT allocation so mark it as such
> >> */
> >> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMCG) && (type == KMALLOC_NORMAL))
> >> - flags |= SLAB_NO_MERGE;
> >> + if (!mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled()) {
> >
> > the same as above
> >
> > Others look good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Hao Li <hao.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> >> + if (type == KMALLOC_NORMAL && KMALLOC_RECLAIM != KMALLOC_NORMAL)
> >> + flags |= SLAB_NO_MERGE;
> >> + else
> >> + flags |= SLAB_MAY_ACCOUNT;
> >> + }
> >>
> >> if (minalign > ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN) {
> >> aligned_size = ALIGN(aligned_size, minalign);
> >> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> >> index d78d3e50c877..30435e2509ea 100644
> >> --- a/mm/slub.c
> >> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> >> @@ -2557,7 +2557,7 @@ bool memcg_slab_post_charge(void *p, gfp_t flags)
> >> * of slab_obj_exts being allocated from the same slab and thus the slab
> >> * becoming effectively unfreeable.
> >> */
> >> - if (is_kmalloc_normal(s))
> >> + if (!cache_needs_objcg(s))
> >> return true;
> >>
> >> /* Ignore already charged objects. */
> >> @@ -3435,6 +3435,10 @@ static struct slab *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
> >>
> >> slab->objects = oo_objects(oo);
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> >> + if (cache_needs_objcg(s))
> >> + slab->obj_exts_needs_objcg = 1;
> >> +#endif
> >> slab->slab_cache = s;
> >>
> >> kasan_poison_slab(slab);
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.55.0
> >>
> >
>

--
Thanks,
Hao