Re: [PATCH slab/for-next v4 4/8] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves
From: hu.shengming
Date: Thu Jul 23 2026 - 06:47:25 EST
Harry wrote:
> __kfree_rcu_sheaf() cannot invoke call_rcu() when spinning is not
> allowed and IRQs are disabled. To relax the limitation, extend the
> deferred free fallback so that a full rcu sheaf can be submitted to
> call_rcu() via the existing IRQ work.
>
> Since the deferred mechanism does more than deferred freeing of objects,
> rename the struct to deferred_percpu_work and adjust names accordingly.
>
> When a sheaf is queued on an IRQ work, it is detached from
> pcs->rcu_free but call_rcu() is not invoked until the irq_work runs.
> To keep the kvfree_rcu barrier's promise, call irq_work_sync() on each
> CPU before calling rcu_barrier().
>
> In the meantime, remove the TODO item as apparently there is no simple
> and effective way to achieve that. This is because, unlike sheaves,
> kfree_rcu() batches objects from different caches together.
>
> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/slab.h | 2 +-
> mm/slab_common.c | 7 ++---
> mm/slub.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 85ef2ebc9812..fdd293b3efa5 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ void __kmem_obj_info(struct kmem_obj_info *kpp, void *object, struct slab *slab)
> void __check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n,
> const struct slab *slab, bool to_user);
>
> -void defer_free_barrier(void);
> +void deferred_work_barrier(void);
>
> static inline bool slub_debug_orig_size(struct kmem_cache *s)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index e07b4e6d6679..9c9ae1384f47 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
> }
>
> /* Wait for deferred work from kmalloc/kfree_nolock() */
> - defer_free_barrier();
> + deferred_work_barrier();
>
> cpus_read_lock();
> mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
> @@ -2113,13 +2113,10 @@ void kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
> cpus_read_lock();
> flush_rcu_sheaves_on_cache(s);
> cpus_read_unlock();
> + deferred_work_barrier();
> rcu_barrier();
> }
>
Hi Harry,
I noticed that your fix in [1] serializes defer_free_barrier() to
avoid concurrent irq_work_sync() waiters.
However, this patch still calls the renamed deferred_work_barrier()
outside that serialization scope, including the new call sites in
kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache() and flush_all_rcu_sheaves().
Is this series expected to depend on [1], with these call sites
moved under the same serialization? Or am I missing something?
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260624-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v1-4-fdf4d17351dd@xxxxxxxxxx/
thanks,
--
With Best Regards,
Shengming
> - /*
> - * TODO: Introduce a version of __kvfree_rcu_barrier() that works
> - * on a specific slab cache.
> - */
> __kvfree_rcu_barrier();
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache);
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 680fe64aff72..8afa6b47b1f2 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -418,6 +418,8 @@ struct slab_sheaf {
> union {
> struct rcu_head rcu_head;
> struct list_head barn_list;
> + /* only used to defer call_rcu() in unknown context */
> + struct llist_node llnode;
> /* only used for prefilled sheafs */
> struct {
> unsigned int capacity;
> @@ -4077,6 +4079,20 @@ static void flush_all(struct kmem_cache *s)
> cpus_read_unlock();
> }
>
> +struct deferred_percpu_work {
> + struct llist_head objects;
> + struct llist_head rcu_sheaves;
> + struct irq_work work;
> +};
> +
> +static void deferred_percpu_work_fn(struct irq_work *work);
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct deferred_percpu_work, deferred_percpu_work) = {
> + .objects = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(objects),
> + .rcu_sheaves = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(rcu_sheaves),
> + .work = IRQ_WORK_INIT(deferred_percpu_work_fn),
> +};
> +
> static void flush_rcu_sheaf(struct work_struct *w)
> {
> struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs;
> @@ -4148,6 +4164,7 @@ void flush_all_rcu_sheaves(void)
> mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
> cpus_read_unlock();
>
> + deferred_work_barrier();
> rcu_barrier();
> }
>
> @@ -6136,16 +6153,6 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
> if (likely(rcu_sheaf->size < s->sheaf_capacity)) {
> rcu_sheaf = NULL;
> } else {
> - /*
> - * With !allow_spin, we might have interrupted call_rcu()'s
> - * IRQ-disabled critical section. If IRQs are not disabled,
> - * we know that's not the case.
> - */
> - if (unlikely(!allow_spin && irqs_disabled())) {
> - rcu_sheaf->size--;
> - local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
> - goto fail;
> - }
> pcs->rcu_free = NULL;
> rcu_sheaf->node = numa_node_id();
> }
> @@ -6154,8 +6161,22 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
> * we flush before local_unlock to make sure a racing
> * flush_all_rcu_sheaves() doesn't miss this sheaf
> */
> - if (rcu_sheaf)
> - call_rcu(&rcu_sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
> + if (rcu_sheaf) {
> + /*
> + * With !allow_spin, we might have interrupted call_rcu()'s
> + * IRQ-disabled critical section. If IRQs are not disabled,
> + * we know that's not the case.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!allow_spin && irqs_disabled())) {
> + struct deferred_percpu_work *dpw;
> +
> + dpw = this_cpu_ptr(&deferred_percpu_work);
> + if (llist_add(&rcu_sheaf->llnode, &dpw->rcu_sheaves))
> + irq_work_queue(&dpw->work);
> + } else {
> + call_rcu(&rcu_sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
> + }
> + }
>
> local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
>
> @@ -6354,31 +6375,21 @@ static void free_to_pcs_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, void **p)
> }
> }
>
> -struct defer_free {
> - struct llist_head objects;
> - struct irq_work work;
> -};
> -
> -static void free_deferred_objects(struct irq_work *work);
> -
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct defer_free, defer_free_objects) = {
> - .objects = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(objects),
> - .work = IRQ_WORK_INIT(free_deferred_objects),
> -};
> -
> /*
> * In PREEMPT_RT irq_work runs in per-cpu kthread, so it's safe
> * to take sleeping spin_locks from __slab_free().
> * In !PREEMPT_RT irq_work will run after local_unlock_irqrestore().
> */
> -static void free_deferred_objects(struct irq_work *work)
> +static void deferred_percpu_work_fn(struct irq_work *work)
> {
> - struct defer_free *df = container_of(work, struct defer_free, work);
> - struct llist_head *objs = &df->objects;
> + struct deferred_percpu_work *dpw;
> + struct llist_head *objs, *rcu_sheaves;
> struct llist_node *llnode, *pos, *t;
> + struct slab_sheaf *sheaf, *next;
>
> - if (llist_empty(objs))
> - return;
> + dpw = container_of(work, struct deferred_percpu_work, work);
> + rcu_sheaves = &dpw->rcu_sheaves;
> + objs = &dpw->objects;
>
> llnode = llist_del_all(objs);
> llist_for_each_safe(pos, t, llnode) {
> @@ -6402,27 +6413,31 @@ static void free_deferred_objects(struct irq_work *work)
> __slab_free(s, slab, x, x, 1, _THIS_IP_);
> stat(s, FREE_SLOWPATH);
> }
> +
> + llnode = llist_del_all(rcu_sheaves);
> + llist_for_each_entry_safe(sheaf, next, llnode, llnode)
> + call_rcu(&sheaf->rcu_head, rcu_free_sheaf);
> }
>
> static void defer_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *head)
> {
> - struct defer_free *df;
> + struct deferred_percpu_work *dpw;
>
> guard(preempt)();
>
> head = kasan_reset_tag(head);
>
> - df = this_cpu_ptr(&defer_free_objects);
> - if (llist_add(head + s->offset, &df->objects))
> - irq_work_queue(&df->work);
> + dpw = this_cpu_ptr(&deferred_percpu_work);
> + if (llist_add(head + s->offset, &dpw->objects))
> + irq_work_queue(&dpw->work);
> }
>
> -void defer_free_barrier(void)
> +void deferred_work_barrier(void)
> {
> int cpu;
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> - irq_work_sync(&per_cpu_ptr(&defer_free_objects, cpu)->work);
> + irq_work_sync(&per_cpu_ptr(&deferred_percpu_work, cpu)->work);
> }
>
> static __fastpath_inline
>
> --
> 2.53.0