Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] perf/amd/ibs: Limit the max EILVT register count for AMD family 0x10

From: Naveen N Rao

Date: Thu Jul 23 2026 - 07:55:54 EST


Hi Ingo,

On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 10:02:51AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Naveen N Rao (AMD) <naveen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > For AMD family 0x10, EILVT offsets are not assigned by BIOS and is
> > instead assigned by picking the next available EILVT offset. Use the
> > maximum EILVT count for family 0x10 (APIC_EILVT_NR_AMD_10H) rather than
> > an arbitrary maximum EILVT count when looking for the next available
> > EILVT offset.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao (AMD) <naveen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Manali Shukla <manali.shukla@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c
> > index 3531f9c23b8c..555912ac520f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c
> > @@ -1839,13 +1839,13 @@ static void force_ibs_eilvt_setup(void)
> >
> > preempt_disable();
> > /* find the next free available EILVT entry, skip offset 0 */
> > - for (offset = 1; offset < APIC_EILVT_NR_MAX; offset++) {
> > + for (offset = 1; offset < APIC_EILVT_NR_AMD_10H; offset++) {
>
> Nit:
>
> s/APIC_EILVT_NR_AMD_10H
> /APIC_EILVT_NR_MAX_AMD_10H
>
> to make it clear at first sight that this is a (family specific)
> maximum, not some default count or other random value.

Makes sense - I will send that as a separate cleanup on top of this
series.


Thanks for the review!
- Naveen