Re: [PATCH 2/2] ceph: use GFP_KERNEL consistently in __ceph_pool_perm_get()
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko
Date: Thu Jul 23 2026 - 13:29:33 EST
On Thu, 2026-07-23 at 13:47 +0800, Xiubo Li via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubo.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> __ceph_pool_perm_get() has four allocations for building OSD STAT
> requests, three of which used GFP_NOFS and one (the page vector
> allocation) used GFP_KERNEL, making them inconsistent.
__ceph_pool_perm_get() has six allocation calls, not four:
2457: rd_req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(..., GFP_NOFS); // (1) NOT
touched by this patch
2471: err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(rd_req, GFP_NOFS); // (2)
changed -> GFP_KERNEL
2475: wr_req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(..., GFP_NOFS); // (3)
changed -> GFP_KERNEL
2487: err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(wr_req, GFP_NOFS); // (4)
changed -> GFP_KERNEL
2492: pages = ceph_alloc_page_vector(1, GFP_KERNEL); // (5)
already GFP_KERNEL
2526: perm = kmalloc_flex(*perm, pool_ns, ..., GFP_NOFS); // (6) NOT
touched by this patch
Should we change other places too?
Thanks,
Slava.
>
> The function is only called from ceph_try_get_caps() and
> __ceph_get_caps(), both of which are in the user I/O path (read,
> write, fallocate, mmap fault), not in the writeback path. There is
> no risk of recursive writeback, so GFP_NOFS is unnecessarily
> restrictive. Use GFP_KERNEL consistently for all four allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubo.li@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ceph/addr.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
> index e2da3ab9f808..d2ac3df47e97 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
> @@ -2479,12 +2479,12 @@ static int __ceph_pool_perm_get(struct
> ceph_inode_info *ci,
> rd_req->r_base_oloc.pool_ns =
> ceph_get_string(pool_ns);
> ceph_oid_printf(&rd_req->r_base_oid, "%llx.00000000", ci-
> >i_vino.ino);
>
> - err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(rd_req, GFP_NOFS);
> + err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(rd_req, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (err)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> wr_req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(&fsc->client->osdc, NULL,
> - 1, false, GFP_NOFS);
> + 1, false, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!wr_req) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto out_unlock;
> @@ -2495,7 +2495,7 @@ static int __ceph_pool_perm_get(struct
> ceph_inode_info *ci,
> ceph_oloc_copy(&wr_req->r_base_oloc, &rd_req->r_base_oloc);
> ceph_oid_copy(&wr_req->r_base_oid, &rd_req->r_base_oid);
>
> - err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(wr_req, GFP_NOFS);
> + err = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(wr_req, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (err)
> goto out_unlock;
>