Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add LL interrupt placement policy
From: Frank Li
Date: Thu Jul 23 2026 - 16:10:12 EST
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 05:41:36PM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> Move linked-list interrupt placement behind a core callback so eDMA and
> HDMA can use different policies.
>
> Keep the eDMA behavior. For HDMA, place watermarks at descriptor ends,
> before link entries, and every four entries when a descriptor exceeds the
> usable ring capacity or another issued descriptor follows. A later patch
> handles these watermarks as progress events.
>
> Four entries is an empirically chosen coalescing interval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix the zero-based interval so the first watermark is on the fourth
> entry, not the fifth.
> - Revise the commit message and source comments.
>
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 8 +++++++-
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h | 2 ++
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index a9f25a65294e..78d1bb6302fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> @@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ static u32 dw_edma_core_get_free_num(struct dw_edma_chan *chan)
> chan->ll_max;
> }
>
> +static bool dw_edma_core_enable_ll_irq(struct dw_edma_desc *desc, u32 i,
> + u32 free)
> +{
> + return desc->chan->dw->core->ll_irq(desc, i, free);
> +}
> +
> static void dw_edma_core_ll_start(struct dw_edma_desc *desc)
> {
> struct dw_edma_chan *chan = desc->chan;
> @@ -120,7 +126,7 @@ static void dw_edma_core_ll_start(struct dw_edma_desc *desc)
>
> dw_edma_core_ll_data(chan, &desc->burst[i],
> chan->ll_head, chan->cb,
> - i == desc->nburst - 1 || free == 1);
> + dw_edma_core_enable_ll_irq(desc, i, free));
>
> chan->ll_head++;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> index f2c2d5af1fff..8ed37e8a12cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ struct dw_edma_core_ops {
> void (*ll_link)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan, u32 idx, bool cb, u64 addr);
> void (*ll_clear)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan, u32 idx);
> int (*ll_cur_idx)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan);
> + /* Called with chan->vc.lock held. */
> + bool (*ll_irq)(struct dw_edma_desc *desc, u32 i, u32 free);
> void (*ch_doorbell)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan);
> void (*ch_enable)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan);
> void (*ch_config)(struct dw_edma_chan *chan);
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> index c31fff095b4f..62141aa32e50 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,15 @@ static int dw_edma_v0_core_ll_cur_idx(struct dw_edma_chan *chan)
> return (val - base) / EDMA_LL_SZ;
> }
>
> +static bool dw_edma_v0_core_ll_irq(struct dw_edma_desc *desc, u32 i, u32 free)
> +{
> + /*
> + * eDMA reports LL interrupts through DONE. Keep them at
> + * descriptor ends, plus the last free slot to refill the ring.
> + */
> + return i == desc->nburst - 1 || free == 1;
> +}
> +
> /* eDMA debugfs callbacks */
> static void dw_edma_v0_core_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma *dw)
> {
> @@ -685,6 +694,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_core_ops dw_edma_v0_core = {
> .ll_link = dw_edma_v0_core_ll_link,
> .ll_clear = dw_edma_v0_core_ll_clear,
> .ll_cur_idx = dw_edma_v0_core_ll_cur_idx,
> + .ll_irq = dw_edma_v0_core_ll_irq,
> .ch_doorbell = dw_edma_v0_core_ch_doorbell,
> .ch_enable = dw_edma_v0_core_ch_enable,
> .ch_config = dw_edma_v0_core_ch_config,
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> index b2d35f0b7b6d..fb651a83f0f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
> #include "dw-hdma-v0-regs.h"
> #include "dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.h"
>
> +/* Empirically chosen watermark interval. */
> +#define HDMA_V0_WATERMARK_INTERVAL 4
> +
> enum dw_hdma_control {
> DW_HDMA_V0_CB = BIT(0),
> DW_HDMA_V0_TCB = BIT(1),
> @@ -417,6 +420,30 @@ static int dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_cur_idx(struct dw_edma_chan *chan)
> return (val - base) / EDMA_LL_SZ;
> }
>
> +static bool dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_irq(struct dw_edma_desc *desc, u32 i, u32 free)
> +{
> + struct dw_edma_chan *chan = desc->chan;
> + bool needs_progress;
> +
> + /*
> + * Always place a watermark at a descriptor end and before the link
> + * element. The first reports descriptor progress; the second provides
> + * one progress point per ring lap.
> + */
> + if (i == desc->nburst - 1 || chan->ll_head == chan->ll_max - 1)
> + return true;
> +
> + /*
> + * Use periodic watermarks when a descriptor exceeds the usable ring or
> + * when more issued work follows it.
> + */
> + needs_progress = desc->nburst > chan->ll_max - 1 ||
> + !list_is_last(&desc->vd.node, &chan->vc.desc_issued);
> +
> + return needs_progress &&
> + (chan->ll_head + 1) % HDMA_V0_WATERMARK_INTERVAL == 0;
This is not good layer design. edma/hdma supposed just do action to operate
register, less software logic.
Can we move this code to core layer? introduce an 'interval' for difference
backend.
eDMA: interval is number description.
hDMA: interval is HDMA_V0_WATERMARK_INTERVAL
So core layer can use unified logic to handle for both eDMA and hDMA?
Frank
> +}
> +
> /* HDMA debugfs callbacks */
> static void dw_hdma_v0_core_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma *dw)
> {
> @@ -441,6 +468,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_core_ops dw_hdma_v0_core = {
> .ll_link = dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_link,
> .ll_clear = dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_clear,
> .ll_cur_idx = dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_cur_idx,
> + .ll_irq = dw_hdma_v0_core_ll_irq,
> .ch_doorbell = dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_doorbell,
> .ch_enable = dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_enable,
> .ch_config = dw_hdma_v0_core_ch_config,
> --
> 2.51.0
>