Re: [PATCH 34/36] smb: client: remove conditional return with no effect
From: Sang-Heon Jeon
Date: Fri Jul 24 2026 - 13:14:27 EST
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 5:27 AM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You can add my Reviewed-by if it is not going through my tree.
>
> Which tree do you want this changeset to go through?
I don't have a strong preference. But some patches in this series have
already been picked up by their subsystem trees, and I'm planning to
send v2 that fixes several issues and addresses feedback.
So could you take this patch through the cifs tree? Then I will
happily drop this patch from v2.
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 2:04 PM Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Both branches of the check return the same value, so the check has
> > no effect. Remove it and return the value directly.
> >
> > This is the result of running the Coccinelle script from
> > scripts/coccinelle/misc/cond_return_no_effect.cocci.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/smb/client/smb1maperror.c | 6 +-----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/smb/client/smb1maperror.c b/fs/smb/client/smb1maperror.c
> > index ab3d09613c91..395299f9121b 100644
> > --- a/fs/smb/client/smb1maperror.c
> > +++ b/fs/smb/client/smb1maperror.c
> > @@ -234,11 +234,7 @@ int __init smb1_init_maperror(void)
> > if (rc)
> > return rc;
> >
> > - rc = mapping_table_ERRSRV_is_sorted();
> > - if (rc)
> > - return rc;
> > -
> > - return rc;
> > + return mapping_table_ERRSRV_is_sorted();
> > }
> >
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMB1_KUNIT_TESTS)
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
Thanks for reviewing.
Best Regards,
Sang-Heon Jeon