[PATCH RFC v4 01/12] x86/mm: add untagged_addr_remote_unlocked()

From: Rik van Riel

Date: Fri Jul 24 2026 - 18:32:34 EST


__access_remote_vm() reads another process's memory under the mmap lock. On
large machines running big multi-threaded applications, that lock is
contended between readers and writers: an mmap() or munmap() in one thread
stalls readers like /proc/PID/cmdline, /proc/PID/environ, or
process_vm_readv(), even though the memory they read is almost always
resident and reachable under the per-VMA lock instead.

Looking up the VMA first requires untagging the address.
untagged_addr_remote() asserts the mmap lock only because it reads
mm->context.untag_mask, which can race with the write in mm_enable_lam().

That mask changes only while the target is single-threaded, when it
enables LAM or resets it at exec. The read need not be stable: it is
already read locklessly elsewhere, and a remote untag is best-effort.

Add untagged_addr_remote_unlocked() for callers that have not taken the
mmap lock, and annotate access to mm->context.untag_mask with READ_ONCE()
and WRITE_ONCE() so the existing lockless reads are explicit and
KCSAN-clean. untagged_addr_remote() keeps its assertion and shares the same
code.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.8
Acked-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 6 +++---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 15 ++++++++++++---
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/uaccess.h | 7 +++++++
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index ef5b507de34e..cee710f64658 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -100,18 +100,18 @@ static inline unsigned long mm_lam_cr3_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
static inline void dup_lam(struct mm_struct *oldmm, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm->context.lam_cr3_mask = oldmm->context.lam_cr3_mask;
- mm->context.untag_mask = oldmm->context.untag_mask;
+ WRITE_ONCE(mm->context.untag_mask, READ_ONCE(oldmm->context.untag_mask));
}

#define mm_untag_mask mm_untag_mask
static inline unsigned long mm_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- return mm->context.untag_mask;
+ return READ_ONCE(mm->context.untag_mask);
}

static inline void mm_reset_untag_mask(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- mm->context.untag_mask = -1UL;
+ WRITE_ONCE(mm->context.untag_mask, -1UL);
}

#define arch_pgtable_dma_compat arch_pgtable_dma_compat
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
index 20de34cc9aa6..a095165eb648 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -39,18 +39,27 @@ static inline unsigned long __untagged_addr(unsigned long addr)
(__force __typeof__(addr))__untagged_addr(__addr); \
})

+/*
+ * mm->context.untag_mask changes only when the target enables LAM or execs,
+ * always single-threaded. An unlocked remote reader can race that; READ_ONCE
+ * keeps the value whole and the untag is best-effort.
+ */
static inline unsigned long __untagged_addr_remote(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long addr)
{
- mmap_assert_locked(mm);
- return addr & (mm)->context.untag_mask;
+ return addr & READ_ONCE(mm->context.untag_mask);
}

-#define untagged_addr_remote(mm, addr) ({ \
+#define untagged_addr_remote_unlocked(mm, addr) ({ \
unsigned long __addr = (__force unsigned long)(addr); \
(__force __typeof__(addr))__untagged_addr_remote(mm, __addr); \
})

+#define untagged_addr_remote(mm, addr) ({ \
+ mmap_assert_locked(mm); \
+ untagged_addr_remote_unlocked(mm, addr); \
+})
+
#endif

#define valid_user_address(x) \
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index d44afbe005bb..9fa659117f38 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static void enable_lam_func(void *__mm)
static void mm_enable_lam(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm->context.lam_cr3_mask = X86_CR3_LAM_U57;
- mm->context.untag_mask = ~GENMASK(62, 57);
+ WRITE_ONCE(mm->context.untag_mask, ~GENMASK(62, 57));

/*
* Even though the process must still be single-threaded at this
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ long do_arch_prctl_64(struct task_struct *task, int option, unsigned long arg2)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ADDRESS_MASKING
case ARCH_GET_UNTAG_MASK:
- return put_user(task->mm->context.untag_mask,
+ return put_user(mm_untag_mask(task->mm),
(unsigned long __user *)arg2);
case ARCH_ENABLE_TAGGED_ADDR:
return prctl_enable_tagged_addr(task->mm, arg2);
diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
index eddbbb65ccc4..7e6e4c89184c 100644
--- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@
})
#endif

+#ifndef untagged_addr_remote_unlocked
+#define untagged_addr_remote_unlocked(mm, addr) ({ \
+ (void)(mm); \
+ untagged_addr(addr); \
+})
+#endif
+
#ifdef masked_user_access_begin
#define can_do_masked_user_access() 1
# ifndef masked_user_write_access_begin

base-commit: 248951ddc14de84de3910f9b13f51491a8cd91df
--
2.53.0-Meta