Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: nv04 FIFO cleanup + recovery for Tesla
From: Marek Czernohous
Date: Sat Jul 25 2026 - 15:01:56 EST
Please do not apply this series. Since sending it I have been running it on
the reference machine and found three defects in it, one of which is a
guaranteed crash on exactly the hardware it targets.
1) Patch 2/2 calls nvkm_chan_error(chan, true). nv50 and g84 channels have
no .preempt callback and the call site in nvkm_chan_error() is not
guarded, so this dereferences a NULL function pointer under chan->lock
in interrupt context. It fired here on 2026-06-02 on the first CACHE_ERROR
after a VRAM stress test:
fifo: CACHE_ERROR - ch 2 [labwc[3950]] subc 3 mthd 0f00 data 0000007b
nv04_fifo_intr_cache_error+0x111 -> nv04_fifo_recover+0x80
-> nvkm_chan_error+0x99
RIP: 0010:0x0
The oops escalated to a panic and the watchdog reset the machine.
2) Killing the channel on the first fault is wrong. There is a single PFIFO
cache puller and on a fault it names the channel that is resident, not
necessarily the one that caused it, as nv04_fifo_pause() already
documents. Here this killed the Wayland compositor twice for faults it
did not cause.
3) On Tesla a killed channel is not survivable at all. The channel-killed
event is only subscribed for FERMI_CHANNEL_GPFIFO and newer, so
nouveau_fence_context_kill() never runs and the pending fences of the
killed channel are never signalled. The display commit tail and the TTM
delayed-delete workers then wait forever, uninterruptibly. The series as
posted therefore trades a recoverable fault for an unrecoverable hang.
v2 fixes all three and adds a prerequisite patch for the event
subscription. It is written and rebased, but I am not sending it yet: the
new escalation logic has only hours of runtime here and no fault has hit it
so far. I would rather restore the debugfs fault injector I used for the
original validation and demonstrate the corrected paths with injected
faults than post a second series that is short on evidence. That is what I
am doing next.
Lyude: v2 will carry the Assisted-by trailers, as offered in my reply to
your question in May.
Sorry for the noise, and thanks for not having applied it yet.
Marek